344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646783)
1. U.S. inquiry on misconduct in discovery of AIDS virus.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1990 Oct; ():1, 6. PubMed ID: 11646783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Federal inquiry finds misconduct by a discoverer of the AIDS virus.
Hilts P
N Y Times Web; 1992 Dec; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. American scientist who found H.I.V. is investigated anew.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1992 Mar; ():A1, B9. PubMed ID: 11646925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Science friction.
Gladwell M
Washington Post; 1992 Dec; ():18-21, 49-51. PubMed ID: 11646256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Conduct unbecoming?
Weiss P
N Y Times Mag; 1989 Oct; ():40-41, 68-69, 95. PubMed ID: 11650263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific misconduct: new court challenge for OSI.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Apr; 356(6369):466. PubMed ID: 11642987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. US Government inquiry bodies dismiss scientific misconduct charges against AIDS researchers.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(22):2665-6. PubMed ID: 8133572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Misconduct charges dropped against AIDS virus scientist.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():1, 11. PubMed ID: 11647009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Fraudbusters back at NIH.
Culliton BJ
Science; 1990 Jun; 48(4963):1599. PubMed ID: 11653895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Nobelist apologizes for defending research paper with faulty data.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1991 May; ():1, 7. PubMed ID: 11646854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Crucial research data in report biologist signed are held fake.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11646828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Science police.
Dolnick E
Discover; 1994 Feb; 15(2):56-63. PubMed ID: 11653089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Trouble in the laboratory: probing the science of a controversial paper.
Fackelmann KA
Sci News; 1990 Mar; 137(13):200-203, 205. PubMed ID: 11650334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The assault on David Baltimore.
Kevles DJ
New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. No misconduct or fraud in Baltimore case.
Anderson A
Nature; 1988 Dec; 336(6199):505. PubMed ID: 11644320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Agency clears genetic researcher.
Schneider K
N Y Times Web; 1988 Jan; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11646628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How well do university researchers police themselves?: a case at Georgetown raises the question.
Weiser B
Washington Post; 1991 Jan; ():Health Su-13. PubMed ID: 11646786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Hero in exposing science hoax paid dearly.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A1, B6. PubMed ID: 11646838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
