These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646786)
1. How well do university researchers police themselves?: a case at Georgetown raises the question. Weiser B Washington Post; 1991 Jan; ():Health Su-13. PubMed ID: 11646786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Too good to be true. Colt GH Harv Mag; 1983; 85(6):22-28, 54. PubMed ID: 11649472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research project on ear infections dramatizes challenge of conflicts. Cordes C Chron High Educ; 1993 Mar; 39(26):A23, A28. PubMed ID: 11656295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. New charges hit Illmensee. MacKenzie D New Sci; 1984 May; 102(1412):3-4. PubMed ID: 11655608 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fraud squad moves in on universities. Cross M; Connor S; Anderson I New Sci; 1985 Jun; 106(1459):8. PubMed ID: 11655696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Federal agency says two universities did not provide full details in misconduct case: U.S. ex. rel. Condie v. Univ. of California, Univ. of Utah, and Ninnemann (Part III). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1996 Sep; 11(9):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. University physician-researcher conflicts of interest: the inadequacy of current controls and proposed reform. Maatz CT High Technol Law J; 1992; 7():137-88. PubMed ID: 11659962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Misconduct in research: an issue of science policy and practice. Chubin DE Minerva; 1985; 23(2):175-202. PubMed ID: 11645859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The assault on David Baltimore. Kevles DJ New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime. Kline S J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule. US Public Health Service Fed Regist; 1989 Aug; 54(151):32446-51. PubMed ID: 11651184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Nobelist apologizes for defending research paper with faulty data. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1991 May; ():1, 7. PubMed ID: 11646854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose responsibility? Wigodsky HS IRB; 1984; 6(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The demise of the social contract for science: misconduct in science and the nonmodern world. Guston DH Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 11656758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Trouble in the laboratory: probing the science of a controversial paper. Fackelmann KA Sci News; 1990 Mar; 137(13):200-203, 205. PubMed ID: 11650334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts. Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP Account Res; 1999; 7(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11657564 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific misconduct: new court challenge for OSI. Anderson C Nature; 1992 Apr; 356(6369):466. PubMed ID: 11642987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]