These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646791)
41. Lives at stake: how to respond to a woman's refusal of cesarean surgery when she risks losing her child or her life. Tauer CA Health Prog; 1992 Sep; 73(3):18, 20-27. PubMed ID: 11652082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Practical guidelines for action regarding application of CPR/DNR. Fields FR; McKenna JT Death Stud; 1988; 12(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 11650091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Re Baby R: a comment on fetal apprehension. Dawson TB Can J Women Law; 1990; 4(1):265-75. PubMed ID: 11649295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The Hastings Center guidelines on forgoing treatment. Mead AP Clin Ethics Rep; 1988; 2(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11651918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The values history: a new standard of care. Rich BA Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1109-81. PubMed ID: 11652633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The Shulman case and the right to refuse treatment. Sneiderman B Humane Med; 1991; 7(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11651301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Medicine and human rights: emerging substantive standards and procedural protections for medical decision making within the American family. Baron CH Fam Law Q; 1983; 17(1):1-40. PubMed ID: 11658459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Decision-making in terminal care: the days of one's life and the life of one's days. Dickens BM Sask Law Rev; 1986-1987; 51(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11652507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. In re A.C. Di Somma AV Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):249-52. PubMed ID: 11644331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Surrogate decision making for mentally incapacitated adults. Nelson LJ; Golenski JD Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Feb-Mar-Apr; 1(2 3 & 4):1-28. PubMed ID: 11650108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis. Murphy JG Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Appointing an agent to make medical treatment choices. Fowler M Columbia Law Rev; 1984 May; 84(4):985-1031. PubMed ID: 11649964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Trying to live forever. Annas GJ Law Med Health Care; 1987-1988 Winter; 15(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 11650135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans. Rhoden NK Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. An overview of Georgia's living will legislation. Adams CR; Adams CT Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 36():45-75. PubMed ID: 11652443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Colleges say no to forced caesarean sections. Dyer C BMJ; 1994 Jan; 308(6923):224. PubMed ID: 11644510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Fetal surgery: a developing legal dilemma. Rauscher K St Louis Univ Law J; 1987 Sep; 31(3):775-95. PubMed ID: 11658987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. A proposed amendment to the California Natural Death Act to assure the statutory right to control life sustaining treatment decisions. Clementino BJ Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1983; 17(2):579-609. PubMed ID: 11649789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative. Tomlinson AK Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death. Kutner L Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]