183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646793)
1. New hearing on forced medication of inmate.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Nov; ():A30. PubMed ID: 11646793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Court upholds forced treatment of mentally ill by prison officials.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Feb; ():A1, A21. PubMed ID: 11647879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The administration of psychotropic drugs to prisoners: state of the law and beyond.
Floyd J
Calif Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 78(5):1243-85. PubMed ID: 11659407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
Dlugacz HA
Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Two Supreme Court rulings provide mentally ill defendants new protections.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Justices let stand ruling that allows forcibly drugging an inmate before execution.
Lewis NA
N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct; ():A16. PubMed ID: 14610765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. New directions in the right to refuse mental health treatment: the implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
Winick BJ
William Mary Bill Rights J; 1993; 2(2):205-38. PubMed ID: 11659830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Fourteenth amendment--the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs masked by prison bars.
Sindel PE
J Crim Law Criminol; 1991; 81(4):952-80. PubMed ID: 16145787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die.
Stricker BW
McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):317-40. PubMed ID: 15709265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
Winick BJ
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of a mentally ill individual's right to refuse medication under the United States and the New York State constitutions.
Brooks WM
Touro Law Rev; 1991; 8(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 11659527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. State can make inmate sane enough to execute.
Liptak A
N Y Times Web; 2003 Feb; ():A1, A27. PubMed ID: 12812158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reevaluating substantive due process as a source of protection for psychiatric patients to refuse drugs.
Brooks WM
Indiana Law Rev; 1998; 31(4):937-1017. PubMed ID: 15386905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Perry v. Louisiana: medical ethics on death row--is judicial intervention warranted?
Katz DL
Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(3):707-29. PubMed ID: 12186078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The biological alteration cases.
Gelman S
William Mary Law Rev; 1995 May; 36(4):1203-301. PubMed ID: 11660332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Washington v. Harper.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Feb; 110():1028-56. PubMed ID: 12041281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Of pills and needs: involuntarily medicating the psychotic inmate when execution looms.
Cantor JD
Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):117-70. PubMed ID: 17111502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Autonomy for vulnerable populations: the Supreme Court's reckless disregard for self-determination and social science.
Bersoff DN
Villanova Law Rev; 1992; 37(6):1569-605. PubMed ID: 11654411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Forcible medication: a new insanity defence.
Economist; 2003 Mar; 366(8313):31. PubMed ID: 15022679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
