183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646793)
21. The judicial side effects of involuntary medication as it relates to a criminal defendant's right to a fair trial: Riggins v. Nevada.
Gutierrez L
Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 19(2):355-77. PubMed ID: 11660111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Competency to be executed and forced medication: Singleton v. Norris.
Zonana HV
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 14584539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. United States Supreme Court and psychiatry: a critical look.
Malmquist CP
J Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(1-2):137-64. PubMed ID: 11658821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Justices restrict forced medication preceding a trial: mental competency issue. In 6-3 ruling, court says use of drugs must be in best interest of defendant.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2003 Jun; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 14621709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Forcible medication and personal autonomy: the case of Charles Thomas Sell.
Quinlan M
Boston Univ Law Rev; 2004 Feb; 84(1):275-99. PubMed ID: 16211756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. New York court says mentally ill have right to refuse medication.
Gross J
N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11646485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Right of a defendant to refuse antipsychotic medication during a criminal trial.
Williams KG
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Sep; 50(4):1937-9. PubMed ID: 11660177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Supreme Court rules mentally ill prison inmates may be involuntarily medicated.
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1990 May; 41(5):572. PubMed ID: 11642773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Medicate-to-execute: current trends in death penalty jurisprudence and the perils of dual loyalty.
Shaivitz DS
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(1):149-74. PubMed ID: 15468506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Riggins v. Nevada.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1992 May; 112():1810-26. PubMed ID: 12041282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Restored to health to be put to death: reconciling the legal and ethical dilemmas of medicating to execute in Singleton v. Norris.
Hensl KB
Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(2):291-328. PubMed ID: 16485377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Major tranquilizers in prison: drug therapy and the unconsenting inmate.
Sitnick SA
Willamette Law J; 1975; 11(3):378-97. PubMed ID: 11664569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.
Knepper K
Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The right to "just say no": a history and analysis of the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
Cichon DE
LA Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 53(2):283-426. PubMed ID: 11657118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Forced medication of defendants to achieve trial competency: an update on the law after Sell.
Hilgers K; Ramer P
Georget J Leg Ethics; 2004; 17(4):813-26. PubMed ID: 15685765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The right to refuse mental health treatment: a First Amendment perspective.
Winick BJ
Univ Miami Law Rev; 1989 Sep; 44(1):1-103. PubMed ID: 11659280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Court rules mental patients may reject forced drugging.
Bishop K
N Y Times Web; 1987 Dec; ():D21. PubMed ID: 11646633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Update on the right to refuse antipsychotic medication.
Williams KG
DICP; 1991; 25(7-8):849-52. PubMed ID: 11659419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Death, ethics and the state.
Kalt BC
Harv J Law Public Policy; 2000; 23(2):487-550. PubMed ID: 12452157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
