BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646817)

  • 1. Case of two brothers accused of killing parents may test secrecy limit in patient-therapist tie.
    Reinhold R
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Sep; ():B13. PubMed ID: 11646817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Tarasoff" defendants: social justice or ethical decay?
    Leong GB; Eth S; Silva JA
    J Forensic Sci; 1994 Jan; 39(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 11644513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California: psychotherapists, policemen and the duty to warn--an unreasonable extension of the common law?
    Kaplan RB
    Gold Gate Law Rev; 1975; 6(1):229-48. PubMed ID: 11661331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. 6 Jul 1973.
    California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1
    Wests Calif Report; 1973; 108():878-901. PubMed ID: 11646032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. 23 Dec 1974.
    California. Supreme Court
    Wests Calif Report; 1974; 118():129-45. PubMed ID: 11645905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The evolution of Tarasoff: recent developments in the psychiatrist's duties to warn potential victims, protect the public, and predict dangerousness.
    Greenberg LT
    J Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):315-48. PubMed ID: 11658762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Case underlines psychiatric issue: to keep confidences or report threats.
    Marcus FF
    N Y Times Web; 1986 May; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11646505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. 1 Jul 1976.
    California. Supreme Court, In Bank
    Wests Calif Report; 1976; 131():14-42. PubMed ID: 11646056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California: the duty to warn--common law and statutory problems for California psychotherapists.
    Cohen RN
    Calif West Law Rev; 1978; 14(1):153-82. PubMed ID: 11664959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. HIV and family therapists' duty to warn: a legal and ethical analysis.
    Schlossberger E; Hecker L
    J Marital Fam Ther; 1996 Jan; 22(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 11660423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tarasoff and the researcher: does the duty to protect apply in the research setting?
    Appelbaum PS; Rosenbaum A
    Am Psychol; 1989 Jun; 44(6):885-94. PubMed ID: 11644381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidentiality and the "dangerous" patient: implications of Tarasoff for psychiatrists and lawyers.
    Merton V
    Emory Law J; 1982; 31(2):263-343. PubMed ID: 11653483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. I shot the sheriff, but only my analyst knows: shrinking the psychotherapist-patient privilege.
    Domb B
    J Law Health; 1990-1991; 5(2):209-36. PubMed ID: 11651189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tarasoff down under: the psychiatrist's duty to warn in Australia.
    Mendelson D; Mendelson G
    J Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(1-2):33-61. PubMed ID: 11659859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tarasoff duty to warn discussed in three cases: no such duty found in Maryland.
    Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1980; 4(5):313-315. PubMed ID: 11661879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California: psychotherapist's obligation of confidentiality versus the duty to warn.
    Nesbitt NA
    Tulsa Law J; 1977; 12(4):747-57. PubMed ID: 11661722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychotherapist responsibility in notifying individuals at risk for exposure to HIV.
    Girardi JA; Keese RM; Traver LB; Cooksey DR
    J Sex Res; 1988 Feb; 25(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 11659081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Untangling Tarasoff: Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California.
    Seligman BS
    Hastings Law J; 1977 Sep; 29(1):179-210. PubMed ID: 11661581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Murder case damages faith in confidentiality of therapy.
    Hoffman J
    N Y Times Web; 1994 Jun; ():A1, B5. PubMed ID: 11647033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do Tarasoff principles apply in AIDS-related psychotherapy? Ethical decision making and the role of therapist homophobia and perceived client dangerousness.
    McGuire J; Nieri D; Abbott D; Sheridan K; Fisher R
    Prof Psychol Res Pr; 1995 Dec; 26(6):608-11. PubMed ID: 11655032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.