These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Implanted birth control device renews debate over forced contraception. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11646801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Norplant prescription: birth control, women control, or crime control? Arthur SL UCLA Law Rev; 1992 Oct; 40(1):1-101. PubMed ID: 11652185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The constitutionality of the use of the Norplant contraceptive device as a condition of probation. Burke M Hastings Constit Law Q; 1992; 20(1):207-46. PubMed ID: 11652186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Norplant: the new scarlet letter? Flannery MT J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():201-26. PubMed ID: 11645739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Norplant meets the new eugenicists: the impermissibility of coerced contraception. Mertus J; Heller S St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):359-83. PubMed ID: 11652703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. "The price of Norplant is TK.2000! You cannot remove it." -- Clients are refused removal in Norplant trial in Bangladesh. UBINIG Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(1):45-6. PubMed ID: 11651370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproductive technologies and the law: Norplant and the bad mother. Young ME Marriage Fam Rev; 1995; 21(3-4):259-81. PubMed ID: 11654845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. U.S. approves injectable drug as birth control. Leary WE N Y Times Web; 1992 Oct; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 11646958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Research report: Norplant, the five year needle -- an investigation of the Norplant trial in Bangladesh from the user's perspective. UBINIG Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(3):211-28. PubMed ID: 11650964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Norplant debate: birth control or woman control? Spitz SS Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1993; 25(1):131-69. PubMed ID: 11652335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The creation and perpetuation of the mother/body myth: judicial and legislative enlistment of Norplant. Henley M Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):703-77. PubMed ID: 11659736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Hearing focuses on price of Norplant; Wyeth pledges discount for public sector. Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1993 Nov; (18):3-4. PubMed ID: 12318533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Norplant bonuses and the unconstitutional conditions doctrine. Coale DS Tex Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 71(1):189-215. PubMed ID: 11656313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Baltimore school clinics to offer birth control by surgical implant. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1992 Dec; ():A1, A28. PubMed ID: 11647265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies. Sangree S Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Vaccination of children tied to welfare in U.S. proposal. Pear R N Y Times Web; 1990 Nov; ():A1, B16. PubMed ID: 11646790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Whose choice is it, anyway? MacKenzie JP N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11646807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Welfare and coerced contraception: morality implications of state sponsored reproductive control. Blake M Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1995-1996 Spring; 34(2):311-44. PubMed ID: 11654442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]