139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646939)
1. Fertility clinics face crackdown.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1992 Oct; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The fertility market: conflict and competition -- high-tech pregnancies test hope's limit.
Gabriel T
N Y Times Web; 1996 Jan; ():1, 18-19. PubMed ID: 11647496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992: Public Law 102-493.
United States
US Statut Large; 1992 Oct; 106():3146-52. PubMed ID: 11660823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The evolution of laws surrounding in vitro fertilization.
Andrews LB
Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1990 Nov; 8(4):296-303. PubMed ID: 11659385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Pressure to regulate in vitro fertilization grows as demand rises.
N Y Times Web; 1988 Jul; ():B7. PubMed ID: 11646701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Legal issues seen in Vatican call for laws to bar birth technology.
Chambers M
N Y Times Web; 1987 Mar; ():A1, B5. PubMed ID: 11647375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Family-planning clinics face dilemma over their mission.
Lewin T
N Y Times Web; 1991 Jun; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Babies in limbo: law outpaced by fertility advances.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Infertility: the market, the law, and the impact.
Rinehart LA
Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):77-106. PubMed ID: 11660337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Employers winning right to cut back medical insurance.
Freudenheim M
N Y Times Web; 1992 Mar; ():1, 26. PubMed ID: 11646899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Does FTC policy on physician ads spur competition or promote fraud?
Pollner F
Med World News; 1984 May; 25(10):27, 31. PubMed ID: 11645521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Can a baby-making venture deliver?
Cowan AL
N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():D1, D6. PubMed ID: 11646929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fertility innovation or exploitation?
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 11648092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. U.S. abortion rule is upheld by judge.
Lewin T
N Y Times Web; 1988 Jul; ():46. PubMed ID: 11647389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethics panel recommends a ban on human cloning.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1997 Jun; ():22. PubMed ID: 11647217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Five justices uphold U.S. rule curbing abortion advice Some clinics to still advise but forgo aid.
Greenhouse L; Brozan N
N Y Times Web; 1991 May; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 11647436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. U.S. suspends plan to cut off funds for abortion ties.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1988 Mar; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11646665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Legislative guidelines to govern in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
Williams HE
Santa Clara Law Rev; 1986; 26(2):495-518. PubMed ID: 11651873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The dispersion of genetic technologies and the law.
Clayton EW
Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(3 Suppl):S13-5. PubMed ID: 11654184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. U.S. panel seeking restriction on use of DNA in courts.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, C7. PubMed ID: 11646944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
