246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646944)
1. U.S. panel seeking restriction on use of DNA in courts.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, C7. PubMed ID: 11646944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic witness: forensic uses of DNA tests.
Nishimi RY; O'Connor KW; Gwin HL; Anderson MA
J Int Bioethique; 1991; 2(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 11651050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chief says panel backs courts' use of a genetic test.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, A23. PubMed ID: 11647446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA databanks giving police a powerful weapon, and critics.
Goldberg C
N Y Times Web; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 11647549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. DNA identification systems: social policy and civil liberties concerns.
Bereano PL
J Int Bioethique; 1990 Sep; 1(3):146-55. PubMed ID: 11651004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The precarious implications of DNA profiling.
Smith JC
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1994; 55(3):865-88. PubMed ID: 11655079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cuomo seeks genetic data of offenders.
Raab S
N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():27, 34. PubMed ID: 11646946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Criminal DNA data banks: revolution for law enforcement or threat to individual privacy?
Yee YH
Am J Crim Law; 1995; 22(2):461-90. PubMed ID: 11655161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Can the government get into your genes?: A proposed New York statute for the use of genetic identification to establish probable cause.
Cavoli JG
Albany Law Rev; 1992; 55(4):1355-414. PubMed ID: 11652956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Panel discounts special hazards in gene splicing.
Schmeck HM
N Y Times Web; 1987 Aug; ():1, 7. PubMed ID: 11646590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific uncertainty in regulating deliberate release of genetically engineered organisms: substantive judicial review and institutional alternatives.
Deatherage SD
HELR Harvard Environ Law Rev; 1987; 11(1):203-46. PubMed ID: 11650817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Senate adopts tough measures on health workers with AIDS.
Tolchin M
N Y Times Web; 1991 Jul; ():A1, A13. PubMed ID: 11647918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. U.S. sets guidelines on using gene transplants in humans.
Schmeck HM
N Y Times Web; 1985 Sep; ():A1, C3. PubMed ID: 11646639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. F.B.I. set to open its DNA database for fighting crime: some fear for privacy.
Wade N
N Y Times Web; 1998 Oct; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11647318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. DNA identification testing: assessing the threat to privacy.
Burk DL
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1992; 24(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 11656259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fertility clinics face crackdown.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1992 Oct; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The secrets of the genome revealed: threats to genetic privacy.
Doot GM
Wayne Law Rev; 1991; 37(3):1615-45. PubMed ID: 11659542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Judge bars birth control notification.
Hilts PJ
Washington Post; 1983 Feb; ():A1, A6. PubMed ID: 11646363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Parental notification rule rejected again.
Kamen A
Washington Post; 1983 Jul; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 11646365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
