209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11646946)
1. Cuomo seeks genetic data of offenders.
Raab S
N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():27, 34. PubMed ID: 11646946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. DNA databanks giving police a powerful weapon, and critics.
Goldberg C
N Y Times Web; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 11647549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Albany plan widely expands sampling of criminals DNA.
Pérez-Peña R; Blair J
N Y Times Web; 1999 Aug; ():A1, B4. PubMed ID: 11647668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Can the government get into your genes?: A proposed New York statute for the use of genetic identification to establish probable cause.
Cavoli JG
Albany Law Rev; 1992; 55(4):1355-414. PubMed ID: 11652956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Allowing new technology to erode constitutional protections: a Fourth Amendment challenge to non-consensual DNA testing of prisoners.
Love SH
Villanova Law Rev; 1993; 38(5):1617-60. PubMed ID: 11653232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Criminal DNA data banks: revolution for law enforcement or threat to individual privacy?
Yee YH
Am J Crim Law; 1995; 22(2):461-90. PubMed ID: 11655161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA testing proposals.
N Y Times Web; 1998 Dec; ():A32. PubMed ID: 11647657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. F.B.I. set to open its DNA database for fighting crime: some fear for privacy.
Wade N
N Y Times Web; 1998 Oct; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11647318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A rape defendant with no identity, but a DNA profile.
Dedman B
N Y Times Web; 1999 Oct; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11647723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Giuliani backs DNA testing of newborns for identification.
Lambert B
N Y Times Web; 1998 Dec; ():B4. PubMed ID: 11647658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic privacy: constitutional considerations in forensic DNA testing.
Burk DL; Hess JA
Geoge Mason Univ Civ Rights Law J; 1994; 5(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11657430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic witness: forensic uses of DNA tests.
Nishimi RY; O'Connor KW; Gwin HL; Anderson MA
J Int Bioethique; 1991; 2(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 11651050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA identification testing: assessing the threat to privacy.
Burk DL
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1992; 24(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 11656259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Privacy concerns regarding government use of genetic information.
Dash JF
J Biolaw Bus; 1999; 2(4):46-54. PubMed ID: 11658225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. U.S. panel seeking restriction on use of DNA in courts.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, C7. PubMed ID: 11646944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. DNA identification systems: social policy and civil liberties concerns.
Bereano PL
J Int Bioethique; 1990 Sep; 1(3):146-55. PubMed ID: 11651004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The precarious implications of DNA profiling.
Smith JC
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1994; 55(3):865-88. PubMed ID: 11655079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Quietly, DNA testing transforms sleuth's job -- but practice alarms civil libertarians.
Rohde D
N Y Times Web; 1999 Mar; ():B1, B5. PubMed ID: 11647661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Murderers have rights too.
New Sci; 1998 May; 158(2135):3. PubMed ID: 11657473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Unusual suspects: will justice suffer if the police rely too heavily on DNA testing?
Motluk A
New Sci; 1998 May; 158(2135):18-9. PubMed ID: 11657472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
