180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647095)
1. Life and death choice splits a family.
Lewin T
N Y Times Web; 1996 Jan; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11647095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. "Mary, Mary, quite contrary, how was I to know?" Michael Martin, absolute prescience, and the right to die in Michigan.
Broder AJ; Cranford RE
Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1995; 72(4):787-832. PubMed ID: 11654371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Surrogate decision making for mentally incapacitated adults.
Nelson LJ; Golenski JD
Clin Ethics Rep; 1987 Feb-Mar-Apr; 1(2 3 & 4):1-28. PubMed ID: 11650108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Right to decline life-prolonging procedures.
Florida
Wests Fla Statut Annot Fla; 1985; Sections 765.01 to 765.15(Suppl. Pamphlet):. PubMed ID: 12043654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The "small beginnings" of euthanasia: examining the erosion in legal prohibitions against mercy-killing.
Koop CE; Grant ER
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):585-634. PubMed ID: 11650885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Active euthanasia: can it be justified?
Molenda FA
Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(1):15-43. PubMed ID: 11649265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Legal and psychological considerations in the development of a euthanasia statute for adults in the United States.
Maier DM; Newman MJ
Behav Sci Law; 1995; 13(1):3-25. PubMed ID: 11645311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The right to death.
Dworkin R
New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Will the real Michael Martin please speak up! Medical decisionmaking for questionably competent persons.
Marzen TJ; Avila D
Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1995; 72(4):833-71. PubMed ID: 11654372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Euthanasia: a comparison of the criminal laws of Germany, Switzerland and the United States.
Sayid MD
Boston College Int Comp Law Rev; 1983; 6(2):533-62. PubMed ID: 11649614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ignoring "right to die" directives, medical community is being sued.
Lewin T
N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():1, 28. PubMed ID: 11647104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A proposed amendment to the California Natural Death Act to assure the statutory right to control life sustaining treatment decisions.
Clementino BJ
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1983; 17(2):579-609. PubMed ID: 11649789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Northern Territory, a place apart, learns price of euthanasia.
Witcher SK
Wall St J (East Ed); 1997 Jan; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 11647509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Louisiana's Natural Death Act and dilemmas in medical ethics.
Vitiello M
LA Law Rev; 1985; 46(2):259-309. PubMed ID: 11649843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A right to die?
Clark Me
Newsweek; 1975 Nov; 86(18):58-60+. PubMed ID: 11664452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases.
Riga PJ
Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law.
Tarantino LM
Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Commentary: anxieties as a legal impediment to the doctor-proxy relationship.
Kapp MB
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 11657145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The real ethic of death and dying.
Cantor NL
Mich Law Rev; 1996 May; 94(6):1718-38. PubMed ID: 11656929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
