These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647095)
21. Artes moriendi: active euthanasia and the art of dying. Gifford EA UCLA Law Rev; 1993 Aug; 40(6):1545-85. PubMed ID: 11652717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Conroy, best interests, and the handling of dying patients. Cantor NL Rutgers Law Rev; 1985; 37(3):543-77. PubMed ID: 11649747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live". Kamisar Y Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1203-42. PubMed ID: 11652581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Caring or starving? The case of Claire Conroy. McCormick RA America (NY); 1985 Apr; 152(13):269-73. PubMed ID: 11658669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparative analysis of the right to die in the Netherlands and the United States after Cruzan: reassessing the right of self-determination. DiCamillo JA Am Univ J Int Law Policy; 1992; 7(4):807-42. PubMed ID: 12091922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach. Marzen TJ Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision. Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Balancing the right to die with competing interests: a socio-legal enigma. Peterson GW Pepperdine Law Rev; 1985; 13(1):109-55. PubMed ID: 11658936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. AIDS and informed consent: recognizing partners as surrogate decision-makers. Grabowski BJ Vt Law Rev; 1991; 15(2):333-67. PubMed ID: 11659512 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri. Johnson SH St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Euthanasia and law reform. Samek R Ottawa Law Rev; 1984; 17(1):86-115. PubMed ID: 11649198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections. Kadish SH Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The care and treatment of the terminally ill: questions raised by McConnell v. Beverly Enterprises-Connecticut, Inc. Peters EA Conn Law Rev; 1989; 21(3):543-50. PubMed ID: 11650429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Damage actions for nonconsensual life-sustaining medical treatment. Dooling RP St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):895-918. PubMed ID: 11649881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The case for active voluntary euthanasia. Larue GA; Humphry D; Risley RL; Fletcher J; Kuhse H; Admiraal P Free Inq; 1988-1989 Winter; 9(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 11654115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The other pro choice - pro life issue: a comparison of euthanasia law in the United States and the Netherlands. Thomas MS J Transnatl Law Policy; 1993; 2(1):323-51. PubMed ID: 11652307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Deciding for the incompetent patient: identifying the role of family members. Healey JM Conn Med; 1984 Oct; 48(10):687. PubMed ID: 11644167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Physicians and euthanasia. Humphry D Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 11654768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Chicago opinion of marginal value. Parnisari EP Health Prog; 1988 Mar; 69(2):8, 10. PubMed ID: 11645605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. A line less reasonable: Cruzan and the looming debate over active euthanasia. Grant ER; Cleaver CA Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):99-256. PubMed ID: 11651215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]