105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647144)
1. Scottish scientists clone adult sheep: technique's use with humans is feared.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1997 Feb; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 11647144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. F.D.A. stand on cloning raises even more questions.
Stolberg SG
N Y Times Web; 1998 Jan; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Why the rush to ban cloning?
Caplan AL
N Y Times Web; 1998 Jan; ():A25. PubMed ID: 11647554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Scientists cultivate cells at root of human life: hope for transplants and gene therapy -- ethics at issue.
Wade N
N Y Times Web; 1998 Nov; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11648076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Senate, 54-42, rejects Republican bill to ban human cloning.
Alvarez L
N Y Times Web; 1998 Feb; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11647551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. With cloning of a sheep, the ethical ground shifts.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1997 Feb; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11647276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Greater regulation of fertility encouraged. Bioethics Council seeking changes.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 2004 Apr; ():A8. PubMed ID: 15250092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cloning without human clones.
Wadman M
Wall St J (East Ed); 1998 Jan; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11647559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. After Dolly, a slippery ban on human cloning.
Wright S
Christ Sci Monitor; 1997 Jun; ():19. PubMed ID: 11647231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ban cloning? Not a chance.
Sale K
N Y Times Web; 1997 Mar; ():A31. PubMed ID: 11647206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Should we fear Dolly?
Glassman JK
Washington Post; 1997 Feb; ():A17. PubMed ID: 11647141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Human cloning and the law.
Newman SA
J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(3):59-62. PubMed ID: 11657282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinton bans federal money for efforts to clone humans.
Seeyle KQ
N Y Times Web; 1997 Mar; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11647191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethics of cloning: who decides?
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1993 Nov; ():Health, 12-13, 15. PubMed ID: 11647945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Federal embryo research is backed: ethicists see benefits overriding qualms.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1999 May; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical evolution: will Homo sapiens become obsolete?
Easterbrook G
New Repub; 1999 Mar; 220(9):20-5. PubMed ID: 11660613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. To ban or not to ban?
Gorman C
Time; 1997 Jun; 149(24):66. PubMed ID: 11656687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Anatomy of a decision: ethics panel's wooly work.
Spotts PN
Christ Sci Monitor; 1997 Jun; ():4. PubMed ID: 11647230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cloning and the U.S. Congress.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2002 May; 346(20):1599-602. PubMed ID: 11994549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientists urge senators not to rush to ban human cloning.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1997 Mar; ():B11. PubMed ID: 11647189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
