172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647189)
1. Scientists urge senators not to rush to ban human cloning.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1997 Mar; ():B11. PubMed ID: 11647189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Experts urge no hasty curbs on cloning.
Bruni F
N Y Times Web; 1997 Mar; ():B2. PubMed ID: 11647187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethics panel recommends a ban on human cloning.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1997 Jun; ():22. PubMed ID: 11647217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Will cloning beget disaster?
Baltimore D; Coles R; Fagan JB; Jakobovits I; Frist B; Kass LR; O'Connor J; Silverberg R; Teller E
Wall St J (East Ed); 1997 May; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Senate, 54-42, rejects Republican bill to ban human cloning.
Alvarez L
N Y Times Web; 1998 Feb; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11647551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinton bans federal money for efforts to clone humans.
Seeyle KQ
N Y Times Web; 1997 Mar; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11647191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Why the rush to ban cloning?
Caplan AL
N Y Times Web; 1998 Jan; ():A25. PubMed ID: 11647554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Commission on cloning: ready-made controversy.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1997 Jun; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11647219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans.
Kass LR
New Repub; 1997 Jun; 216(22):17-26. PubMed ID: 11654974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ban cloning? Not a chance.
Sale K
N Y Times Web; 1997 Mar; ():A31. PubMed ID: 11647206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientists cultivate cells at root of human life: hope for transplants and gene therapy -- ethics at issue.
Wade N
N Y Times Web; 1998 Nov; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11648076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. President asks experts for advice on the new reality of cloning.
Purdum TS
N Y Times Web; 1997 Feb; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11647139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Human Cloning Prohibition Act: did Congress go too far?
Cannon J; Haas M
Harvard J Legis; 1998; 35(2):637-45. PubMed ID: 11660809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. F.D.A. stand on cloning raises even more questions.
Stolberg SG
N Y Times Web; 1998 Jan; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Recommendation is near on embryo cell research: ethics panel expected to urge end to ban.
Wade N
N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11648121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Greater regulation of fertility encouraged. Bioethics Council seeking changes.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 2004 Apr; ():A8. PubMed ID: 15250092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Gene enhancements' thorny ethical traits.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1997 Oct; ():A1, A18-19. PubMed ID: 11647258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Israeli cloning ban endorsed by scientists.
Fishman RH
Lancet; 1999 Jan; 353(9148):218. PubMed ID: 11657094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetics and the law: a scientist's view.
Singer MF
Yale Law Policy Rev; 1985; 3(2):315-35. PubMed ID: 11652467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Rules due on disputed embryo research.
Angier N
N Y Times Web; 1994 Sep; ():C1, C10. PubMed ID: 11647977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
