These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647217)

  • 1. Ethics panel recommends a ban on human cloning.
    Kolata G
    N Y Times Web; 1997 Jun; ():22. PubMed ID: 11647217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Commission on cloning: ready-made controversy.
    Kolata G
    N Y Times Web; 1997 Jun; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11647219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans.
    Kass LR
    New Repub; 1997 Jun; 216(22):17-26. PubMed ID: 11654974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recommendation is near on embryo cell research: ethics panel expected to urge end to ban.
    Wade N
    N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11648121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Greater regulation of fertility encouraged. Bioethics Council seeking changes.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 2004 Apr; ():A8. PubMed ID: 15250092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gene-splice oversight.
    Parens E
    Washington Post; 1996 Jun; ():A21. PubMed ID: 11646331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. President asks experts for advice on the new reality of cloning.
    Purdum TS
    N Y Times Web; 1997 Feb; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11647139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ninety-day wonder.
    Haglund K
    J NIH Res; 1997 Jul; 9(7):10. PubMed ID: 11656639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Panel that reviews gene tests in humans has no applications.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 1996 Feb; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethics of cloning: who decides?
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 1993 Nov; ():Health, 12-13, 15. PubMed ID: 11647945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Little-known panel challenged to make quick cloning study.
    Kolata G
    N Y Times Web; 1997 Mar; ():C1, C9. PubMed ID: 11647204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Much ado about mutton?
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1997 Jun; 349(9068):1850. PubMed ID: 11654834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. National, independent oversight: reinforcing the safety net for human subjects research.
    Mastroianni AC
    Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):303-9. PubMed ID: 11658185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advisory panel votes for use of embryonic cells in research.
    Wade N
    N Y Times Web; 1999 Jun; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11648123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Federal embryo research is backed: ethicists see benefits overriding qualms.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 1999 May; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Human Cloning Prohibition Act: did Congress go too far?
    Cannon J; Haas M
    Harvard J Legis; 1998; 35(2):637-45. PubMed ID: 11660809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bush's advisers on ethics discuss human cloning.
    Stolberg SG
    N Y Times Web; 2002 Jan; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11928748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human cloning and the law.
    Newman SA
    J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(3):59-62. PubMed ID: 11657282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is national, independent oversight needed for the protection of human subjects?
    Capron AM
    Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):283-92. PubMed ID: 11658183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Liberty, identity, and human cloning.
    Robertson JA
    Tex Law Rev; 1998 May; 76(6):1371-456. PubMed ID: 11660439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.