These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647257)

  • 1. A house divided.
    Cohen S
    Washington Post; 1997 Oct; ():12-17, 24-29. PubMed ID: 11647257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans.
    Kass LR
    New Repub; 1997 Jun; 216(22):17-26. PubMed ID: 11654974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In whose image? Religion and the controversy of human cloning.
    Campbell CS
    Second Opin; 1999 Sep; No. 1():24-43. PubMed ID: 11657759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Human Cloning Prohibition Act: did Congress go too far?
    Cannon J; Haas M
    Harvard J Legis; 1998; 35(2):637-45. PubMed ID: 11660809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The IRB, ethics, and the objective study of religion in health.
    Post SG
    IRB; 1995; 17(5-6):8-11. PubMed ID: 11653360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethics panel recommends a ban on human cloning.
    Kolata G
    N Y Times Web; 1997 Jun; ():22. PubMed ID: 11647217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Should there be governmental guidelines in bioethics? The French approach.
    Labrusse-Riou C
    Boston College Int Comp Law Rev; 1989; 12(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 11659185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Federal embryo research is backed: ethicists see benefits overriding qualms.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 1999 May; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The debate about Dolly.
    Klotzko AJ
    Bioethics; 1997 Oct; 11(5):427-38. PubMed ID: 11655121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. At the vortex of controversy: developing guidelines for human embryo research.
    Green RM
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1994 Dec; 4(4):345-56. PubMed ID: 11645283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inquiring into ethics: the Australian Senate and human embryo experimentation.
    Albury RM
    Aust J Soc Issues; 1989 Nov; 24(4):269-84. PubMed ID: 11659350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ninety-day wonder.
    Haglund K
    J NIH Res; 1997 Jul; 9(7):10. PubMed ID: 11656639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Liberty, identity, and human cloning.
    Robertson JA
    Tex Law Rev; 1998 May; 76(6):1371-456. PubMed ID: 11660439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The challenges of public ethics: reflections on NBAC's report.
    Childress JF
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(5):9-11. PubMed ID: 9383658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Much ado about mutton?
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1997 Jun; 349(9068):1850. PubMed ID: 11654834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human gene therapy: application, ethics and regulation.
    Baskerville G
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1992; 96(4):733-63. PubMed ID: 11652212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. IVF--in vitro fertilization.
    Kieffer GH
    Am Biol Teach; 1980 Apr; 42(4):211-218, 231. PubMed ID: 11658496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human embryos and genetic testing: a private policy model.
    Bonnicksen AL
    Politics Life Sci; 1992 Feb; 11(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11659581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction (NABER).
    White GB
    Politics Life Sci; 1995 Feb; 14(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 11654874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinton names 15 to advisory panel on ethics in human experimentation.
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 1996 Jul; ():A9. PubMed ID: 11648024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.