107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647259)
1. The right to die still seems more theory than practice.
Malcolm AH
N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():E5. PubMed ID: 11647259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dying woman wins Jersey ruling to end life-sustaining care.
Sullivan R
N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():B1, B2. PubMed ID: 11647812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In the Matter of Kathleen Farrell.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1987 Jan; 2(4):333-6. PubMed ID: 11644068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In the matter of Beverly Requena.
Nimz M
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 11644091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Wishes of patient in refusing care backed in Jersey.
Sullivan JF
N Y Times Web; 1987 Jun; ():A1, B12. PubMed ID: 11647828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Jersey woman on respirator dies.
Saxon W
N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():B6. PubMed ID: 11646533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In re Jane Doe.
Cameron JC
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):245-7. PubMed ID: 11644330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The judge.
Rymer R
Hippocrates (Sausalito); 1988; 2(3):54-62. PubMed ID: 11650164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases.
Riga PJ
Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In re Farrell.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1987 Jun; 529():404-19. PubMed ID: 11648263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In re Farrell.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Ocean County
Atl Report; 1986 Jun; 514():1342-7. PubMed ID: 11648556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In re Conroy: forging a path to death with dignity.
Agrawal A
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 67(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 11649960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis.
Murphy JG
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill.
Eisenberg KG
Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law.
Miller DH
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1988; 65(2-3):181-212. PubMed ID: 11659201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comatose woman's family presses food-tube removal.
Sullivan R
N Y Times Web; 1986 Mar; ():B2. PubMed ID: 11646499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. 'Right-to-die' theory upheld in New Jersey.
Rust M
Am Med News; 1985 Feb; 28(5):1, 23. PubMed ID: 11653617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "Euthanasia, Aiding Suicide and Cessation of Treatment": a critique.
Williams JR
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1984 Nov; 17(7):589-91. PubMed ID: 11651758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate.
Tecklenburg N
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1982; 31(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11649468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
