These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647327)
21. States needn't fund elective abortions for low-income women, Justices rule. Wall St J (East Ed); 1977 Jun; ():2. PubMed ID: 11649051 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Government funding, abortions, and the public forum. Canby WC Ariz State Law J; 1979; 1979(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 11664054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. 'Hyde decision denies equal health care access'. Branch De Ob Gyn News; 1980 Aug; 15(15):1+. PubMed ID: 11664010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The racially disparate impact of restrictions on the public funding of abortion: an analysis of current equal protection doctrine. Baron DR Boston Coll Third World Law J; 1993; 13(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 11656354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Little Rock Family Planning Services v. Dalton. U.S. District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Little Rock Division Fed Suppl; 1994 Jul; 860():609-31. PubMed ID: 11648416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Supreme Court and abortion: 2. Sidestepping social realities. Mechanic D Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):17-9. PubMed ID: 7007284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Little Rock Family Planning Services v. Dalton; Orr v. Nelson. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Fed Report; 1995 Jul; 60():497-505. PubMed ID: 11648415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ms. Pilpel v. Mr. Hyde. Buckley WF Hum Life Rev; 1978; 4(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 11661548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion. Butler PA Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton. Finn J Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Abortion, Medicaid, and the Constitution. N Y Univ Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 54(1):120-60. PubMed ID: 11663947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The abortion-funding issue: a study in mixed constitutional cues. Yarbrough TE North Carol Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 59(3):611-27. PubMed ID: 11655747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Doe v. Mathews. U.S. District Court, District of Columbia Fed Suppl; 1976 Oct; 422():141-7. PubMed ID: 11648360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinton would end ban on aid to poor seeking abortions. Toner R N Y Times Web; 1993 Mar; ():A1, A21. PubMed ID: 11647468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Orr v. Nelson. U.S. District Court, D. Nebraska Fed Suppl; 1994 Nov; 902():1019-22. PubMed ID: 11648423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Planned Parenthood Affiliates of Michigan v. Engler. U.S. District Court, W.D. Michigan, S.D. Fed Suppl; 1994 Jul; 860():406-10. PubMed ID: 11648413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]