188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647347)
1. Will we still be 'human' if we have engineered genes and animal organs?
Gorovitz S
Washington Post; 1984 Dec; ():C1, C4. PubMed ID: 11647347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Persons and humans: refashioning ourselves in a better image and likeness.
Engelhardt HT
Zygon; 1984 Sep; 19(3):281-95. PubMed ID: 11649785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro fertilization: the ethical issues.
Harris J
Philos Q; 1983 Jul; 33(132):217-37. PubMed ID: 11651764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The human embryo/fetus and genetics.
Sutton A
Biomed Ethics; 1997; 2(2):43-7. PubMed ID: 11657519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Why gene therapy is considered scary but cell therapy isn't.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1990 Sep; ():E5. PubMed ID: 11646785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetics: what shall the human species make of itself?
Frankel C
Washington Post; 1974 Apr; ():B1+. PubMed ID: 11649014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. 'When does life begin?' is the wrong question.
Fairlie H
Washington Post; 1981 Dec; ():C2. PubMed ID: 11647344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion and the golden rule.
Hare RM
Philos Public Aff; 1975; 4(3):201-22. PubMed ID: 11661183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion law in Canada: a need for reform.
Campbell T
Sask Law Rev; 1977; 42():221-50. PubMed ID: 11664124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Embryo research: the standard arguments.
Institute of Medical Ethics (Great Britain)
Brief Med Ethics; 1990 Mar; No. 5():1-3. PubMed ID: 11659228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
Destro RA
Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Do zygotes become people?
Carter WR
Mind; 1982 Jan; 91(361):77-95. PubMed ID: 11655617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Extending the boundaries of life: implications for practice.
Abramson M; Black RB
Health Soc Work; 1985; 10(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 11658746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Does a fetus already have a future-like-ours?
McInerney PK
J Philos; 1990 May; 87(5):264-8. PubMed ID: 11782096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The morality of abortion.
May WE
Linacre Q; 1974 Feb; 41(1):66-78. PubMed ID: 11663451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The federal fetal experimentation regulations: an establishment clause analysis.
Friedman JM
Minn Law Rev; 1977 Jun; 61(6):961-1005. PubMed ID: 11664831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The logic of abortion.
Williams B
Listener; 1977 Sep; 98(2524):258-60. PubMed ID: 11663977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Overruling Roe v. Wade: an analysis of the proposed Constitutional amendments.
Rice CE
Boston Coll Ind Commer Law Rev; 1973 Dec; 15(2):307-41. PubMed ID: 11663416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Personhood, potentiality, and the temporarily comatose patient.
Rogers KA
Public Aff Q; 1992 Apr; 6(2):245-54. PubMed ID: 11652631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Law, policy and personhood in the context of the techniques of human experimentation in modern medicine.
Hicks SC
Cap Univ Law Rev; 1990; 19(2):255-99. PubMed ID: 11659475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
