These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647366)

  • 1. Abortion is affirmed, but in a lower voice.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():E1. PubMed ID: 11647366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abortion's shrinking majority.
    Murphy J
    Time; 1986 Jun; 127(25):30-1. PubMed ID: 11645638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Justices uphold abortion rights by narrow vote.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11647367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bowen v. American Hospital Association: federal regulation is powerless to save Baby Doe.
    Cantrell DF
    Indiana Law Rev; 1986; 19(4):1199-218. PubMed ID: 11650766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High court upsets U.S. intervention on infants' lives.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():1. PubMed ID: 11646482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Killing "the handicapped" -- before and after birth.
    Field MA
    Harv Womens Law J; 1993; 16():79-138. PubMed ID: 11652872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. U.S. wants pro-abortion decision overturned.
    Washington Post; 1985 Jul; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe.
    Drinan RF
    America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Baby Doe's new guardians: federal policy brings nontreatment decisions out of hiding.
    Born MA
    KY Law J; 1986-1987; 75(3):659-75. PubMed ID: 11651897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Life, death and the rights of handicapped babies.
    Schmeck HM
    N Y Times Web; 1985 Jun; ():C1, C3. PubMed ID: 11646493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: distinguishing abortion regulation from attempted intimidation.
    Erato LD
    Loyola Law Rev; 1987; 33(2):498-516. PubMed ID: 11655874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What ever happened to Baby Jane...Doe?
    Jolly CM
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1987; 14(2):543-9. PubMed ID: 11651891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ruling on Baby Doe: impact limited.
    Malcolm AH
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11646486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion.
    Kunz KA
    Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. If not that way, what way?
    America (NY); 1986 Jul; 155(2):21. PubMed ID: 11658787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion and a nation at war.
    First Things; 1992 Oct; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Court gets stark arguments on abortion.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11646254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey.
    Sarno JJ
    Seton Hall Legis J; 1987; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond.
    Phillips CA
    Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rethinking Roe v. Wade.
    Wardle LD
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.