221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647375)
1. Legal issues seen in Vatican call for laws to bar birth technology.
Chambers M
N Y Times Web; 1987 Mar; ():A1, B5. PubMed ID: 11647375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Legislative guidelines to govern in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
Williams HE
Santa Clara Law Rev; 1986; 26(2):495-518. PubMed ID: 11651873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The legal status of the embryo.
Andrews LB
Loyola Law Rev; 1986; 32(2):357-409. PubMed ID: 11658916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Social values in a brave new world: toward a public policy regarding embryo status and in vitro fertilization.
Dickman DG
St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):817-51. PubMed ID: 11649208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Vatican asks governments to curb birth technology and to outlaw surrogates; wide appeal made.
Suro R
N Y Times Web; 1987 Mar; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11646508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Procreational autonomy v. state intervention: opportunity or crisis for a brave new world?
Smith GP
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):635-60. PubMed ID: 11650886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Alternative birth technologies: legal challenges.
Capron AM
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):679-704. PubMed ID: 11659041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: medical technology + social values = legislative solutions.
Milich MF
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(4):875-901. PubMed ID: 11652196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Vatican's moral mission: reproduction report seen as opportunity to influence governments in making laws.
Suro R
N Y Times Web; 1987 Mar; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11646547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The selective funding problem: abortions and religious schools.
McConnell MW
Harv Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 104(5):989-1050. PubMed ID: 11656068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro fertilization: eliminating the current state of limbo between pre-embryonic rights and the fundamental right to procreate.
Langley DB
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1991; 26(4):1217-43. PubMed ID: 11659618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion issue weaves an intricate web.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1986 Apr; ():A26. PubMed ID: 11647369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting the future of privacy in pregnancy: how medical technology affects the legal rights of pregnant women.
Annas GJ
Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):329-53. PubMed ID: 11650347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The right to life in law: the embryo and fetus, the body and soul, the family and society.
Hicks SC
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1991; 19(3):805-50. PubMed ID: 11656190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Latest administration tactic makes abortion fight a free speech issue.
Lewin T
N Y Times Web; 1988 Feb; ():E7. PubMed ID: 11647385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Text of Vatican's doctrinal statement on human reproduction.
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
N Y Times Web; 1987 Mar; ():A14-7. PubMed ID: 11646510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The human preembryo, the progenitors, and the state: toward a dynamic theory of status, rights, and research policy.
Martin PA; Lagod ML
High Technol Law J; 1990; 5(2):257-310. PubMed ID: 11659412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Testimony opposing "Freedom of Choice Act.
Alvare H;
Origins; 1992 Apr; 21(43):692-6. PubMed ID: 11656134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Allocation of decision-making rights to frozen embryos.
Poole EK
Am J Fam Law; 1990; 4(1):67-102. PubMed ID: 11659329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. U.S. suspends plan to cut off funds for abortion ties.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1988 Mar; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11646665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
