296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647412)
21. When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims.
Harvey JC; Quinn KP; Johnson SH
Commonweal; 1990 May; 117(9):286-94. PubMed ID: 11652558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Family matters: is big brother your next-of-kin?
Lomasky LE
Reason; 1990 Nov; 22(6):36-9. PubMed ID: 11652569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The right to die: an exercise of informed consent, not an extension of the constitutional right to privacy.
Lyon EA
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1990; 58(4):1367-95. PubMed ID: 11659504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Wishes of patient in refusing care backed in Jersey.
Sullivan JF
N Y Times Web; 1987 Jun; ():A1, B12. PubMed ID: 11647828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The Cruzan decision -- a surgeon's perspective.
McNoble DJ
Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1990; 20(4):569-610. PubMed ID: 11652628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty.
Bopp J; Avila D
Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.
U.S. Supreme Court
Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Jun; 110():2841-92. PubMed ID: 12041283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Top Maine court backs right to die.
N Y Times Web; 1987 Dec; ():41. PubMed ID: 11646647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Specific intent, substituted judgment and best interests: a nationwide analysis of an individual's right to die.
Delaney JJ
Pace Law Rev; 1991; 11(3):565-641. PubMed ID: 11651454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health: a clear and convincing call for comprehensive legislation to protect incompetent patients' rights.
Suhr JN
Am Univ Law Rev; 1991; 40(4):1477-519. PubMed ID: 11651350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live".
Kamisar Y
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1203-42. PubMed ID: 11652581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The role of families in medical decisions.
Minow M
Utah Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 11659479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Another state joins right-to-die issue.
Robbins W
N Y Times Web; 1987 Nov; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11646625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Another right-to-die case poses new questions.
N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11646799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Appeals court backs family in right to die.
Barron J
N Y Times Web; 1989 Aug; ():B1, B3. PubMed ID: 11646729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Death and life decisions: who is in control?
Kenney SC
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 23(3):791-828. PubMed ID: 11652584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. In re Bayer.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 11644092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Whose rite is it anyway?: the search for a constitutional permit to die.
Berman MB
Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1992; 22(1):105-58. PubMed ID: 11656255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Suicidal competence and the patient's right to refuse lifesaving treatment.
Matthews MA
Calif Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 75(2):707-58. PubMed ID: 11652518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Doing justice to life: for the Cruzans, pain; for principle, a triumph; How to put life in the right to die.
N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11646204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
