These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647428)
1. Surrogate denied custody of child. Mydans S N Y Times Web; 1990 Oct; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647428 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Gestational surrogacy: unsettling state parentage law and surrogacy policy. Hofheimer A Rev Law Soc Change; 1992; 19(3):571-616. PubMed ID: 11659977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A surrogacy issue: who is the other mother? Morgan D Int J Law Fam; 1994 Dec; 8(3):386-412. PubMed ID: 11659968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of legal parentage in egg donation, embryo transplantation, and gestational surrogacy arrangements. Goodwin A Fam Law Q; 1992; 26(3):275-91. PubMed ID: 11659602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Science and the courts take a new look. Mydans S N Y Times Web; 1990 Nov; ():E6. PubMed ID: 11647885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Anna J. v. Mark C.: proof of the imminent need for surrogate motherhood regulation. Smith BP J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(2):493-517. PubMed ID: 11659536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. US battles over surrogacy. McBride G BMJ; 1990 Nov; 301(6760):1062-3. PubMed ID: 11642802 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation. Lorio KV LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Parental rights and the definition of motherhood in surrogate motherhood. Rae SB South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1994; 3(2):219-77. PubMed ID: 11660411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial reproduction and child custody. Dickens BM Can Bar Rev; 1987 Mar; 66(1):49-75. PubMed ID: 11658911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The implications of Davis v. Davis for reproductive rights analysis. Prygoski PJ Tenn Law Rev; 1994; 61(2):609-46. PubMed ID: 11652933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal aspects of artificial human reproduction: can the law afford to play ostrich? Clapshaw D Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1982 Jun; 4(3):254-72. PubMed ID: 11658651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Who are the parents of biotechnological children? Palmer LI Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11660334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. New birth surrogates carry couples' babies. Lawson C N Y Times Web; 1990 Aug; ():1, 24. PubMed ID: 11646780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Babies in limbo: law outpaced by fertility advances. Weiss R Washington Post; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A time to be born, a time to die: alternative reproduction and Texas probate law. Heard LD St Marys Law J; 1986; 17(3):927-63. PubMed ID: 11652490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act. ; Fam Law Rep (Wash D C); 1989 Feb; 15(16):2009-16. PubMed ID: 11659181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Egg donation, motherhood and state law reform: a commentary on Professor Palmer's proposals. Strouse DS Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):31-49. PubMed ID: 11660335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Are you my mother? A judge's decision in in vitro fertilization surrogacy. Seavello SF Hastings Womens Law J; 1992; 3(2):211-44. PubMed ID: 11659653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered? Lieber KB Indiana Law J; 1992; 68(1):205-32. PubMed ID: 11659688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]