These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647428)
21. Davis v. Davis: what about future disputes? Feliciano T Conn Law Rev; 1993; 26(1):305-53. PubMed ID: 11660034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. What does it mean to be a "parent"? The claims of biology as the basis for parental rights. Hill JL N Y Univ Law Rev; 1991 May; 66(2):353-420. PubMed ID: 11659546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Man-made man and the law. Tuchler DJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1978; 22(2):310-25. PubMed ID: 11664955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Surrogate contract: parentage -- Johnson v. Calvert. Grubb A Med Law Rev; 1994; 2(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 12159833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Surrogate parenting. New York McKinneys Consol Laws N Y Annot N Y State; 1993 Jul; Sect. 1906():. PubMed ID: 12041360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Liberty and assisted reproduction. Robertson JA Trial; 1994 Aug; 30(8):48-53. PubMed ID: 11654494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Artificially assisted conception. Long LL Health Law Can; 1985; 5(4):89-107. PubMed ID: 11645666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Draft ABA Model Surrogacy Act. American Bar Association. Section of Family Law, Adoption Committee, and Ad Hoc Surrogacy Committee Fam Law Q; 1988; 22(2):123-43. PubMed ID: 11659040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: legal issues. Field M Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1589-98. PubMed ID: 11653381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The pangs of test-tube birth. Sartwell F Washington Post; 1974 Jul; ():C5. PubMed ID: 11648662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act. Abbas J Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Parental rights and gestational surrogacy: an argument against the genetic standard. Russell-Brown SL Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1992; 23(2):525-54. PubMed ID: 11659610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Legal issues of the new reproductive technologies. Kinney LH Calif State Bar J; 1977; 52(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 11665044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Ghost mothers: human egg donation and the legacy of the past. Katz KD Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):733-80. PubMed ID: 11652863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The itinerant embryo and the neo-nativity scene: bifurcating biological maternity. O'Brien S Utah Law Rev; 1987; 1987-1(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 11658919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Modern reproductive technology and motherhood: the search for common ground and the recognition of difference. Birck ML Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1994; 62(4):1623-57. PubMed ID: 11660067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The right of abortion in surrogate motherhood arrangements. D'Aversa CY North Ill Univ Law Rev; 1987; 7(1):1-39. PubMed ID: 11658910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. In vitro fertilization and surrogate motherhood: the Jewish view. Rosner F J Relig Health; 1983; 22(2):139-60. PubMed ID: 11658738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Too many parents. Capron AM Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(5):22-4. PubMed ID: 11656766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]