263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647433)
1. Michigan court voids ban on state-paid abortions.
N Y Times Web; 1991 Feb; ():B8. PubMed ID: 11647433
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions.
Corns CA
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. State constitutions as a source of individual liberties: expanding protection for abortion funding under Medicaid.
Vuernick R
J Contemp Law; 1993; 19(1):185-216. PubMed ID: 11652310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion.
Hendrickson E
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Doe v. Department of Social Services.
Michigan. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1992 Jun; 487():166-94. PubMed ID: 12041154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Doe v. Director of Department of Social Services.
Michigan. Court of Appeals
Wests North West Rep; 1991 Feb; 468():862-83. PubMed ID: 12041153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Funding of medically-necessary abortions: a reexamination of U.S. law and a call for EC federalism.
Nishi J
Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1992; [1992]():517-38. PubMed ID: 11652961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Fischer v. Department of Public Welfare.
Pennsylvania. Commonwealth Court
Atl Report; 1984 Mar; 482():1137-48. PubMed ID: 11648338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton.
Finn J
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
Gray AD
Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. States rebelling at federal order to cover abortion.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1994 Jan; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 11646999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Right to abortion quietly advances in state courts.
Holmes SA
N Y Times Web; 1998 Dec; ():1, 25. PubMed ID: 11647595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fischer v. Department of Public Welfare.
Pennsylvania. Commonwealth Court
Atl Report; 1984 Sep; 482():1148-62. PubMed ID: 11648341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion.
Butler PA
Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The abortion-funding issue: a study in mixed constitutional cues.
Yarbrough TE
North Carol Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 59(3):611-27. PubMed ID: 11655747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The implantation of rights: an argument for unconditionally funded Norplant removal.
Arnow RS
Berkeley Womens Law J; 1996; 11():19-48. PubMed ID: 11657484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. National health care legislation and the funding of abortion.
Mahoney HM
America (NY); 1993 Oct; 169(11):8-9. PubMed ID: 11659793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Supreme Court rules on access to contraception, abortion: states can deny Medicaid benefits, hospital services for elective abortions.
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Aug; 6(4):41+. PubMed ID: 11663780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Harris v. McRae: the Court retreats from Roe v. Wade.
Brock VM
Loyola Law Rev; 1980; 26(3):749-60. PubMed ID: 11664179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
