123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647446)
1. Chief says panel backs courts' use of a genetic test.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, A23. PubMed ID: 11647446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. U.S. panel seeking restriction on use of DNA in courts.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, C7. PubMed ID: 11646944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic witness: forensic uses of DNA tests.
Nishimi RY; O'Connor KW; Gwin HL; Anderson MA
J Int Bioethique; 1991; 2(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 11651050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Panel discounts special hazards in gene splicing.
Schmeck HM
N Y Times Web; 1987 Aug; ():1, 7. PubMed ID: 11646590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Panel backs curbs on surrogate motherhood.
Janson D
N Y Times Web; 1988 Feb; ():28. PubMed ID: 11646651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. U.S. sets guidelines on using gene transplants in humans.
Schmeck HM
N Y Times Web; 1985 Sep; ():A1, C3. PubMed ID: 11646639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Panel of scientists supports review of biomedical research that terrorists could use.
Wade N
N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct; ():A20. PubMed ID: 14610763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Courts reject DNA fingerprinting, citing controversy after NAS report.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Oct; 359(6394):349. PubMed ID: 1406941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Panel backs gene transplant for cancer treatment test.
Leary WE
N Y Times Web; 1988 Oct; ():A1, C9. PubMed ID: 11646704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Panel endorses banning surrogate births for pay.
Kolbert E
N Y Times Web; 1988 May; ():30. PubMed ID: 11646689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. More research using lower animals urged.
Rensberger B
Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A11. PubMed ID: 11647791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientists urge bigger supply of stem cells: report backs cloning to create new lines.
Stolberg SG
N Y Times Web; 2001 Sep; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 12156473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Panel reports genetic screening has cost some their health plans.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11647267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Proposals on genetic technology: U.S. panel urges easing of regulation.
Andrews EL
N Y Times Web; 1991 Feb; ():D1, D7. PubMed ID: 11646818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA identification systems: social policy and civil liberties concerns.
Bereano PL
J Int Bioethique; 1990 Sep; 1(3):146-55. PubMed ID: 11651004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. U.S. national academies. Advice on science advising leaves plenty of questions.
Mervis J
Science; 2004 Nov; 306(5701):1450-1. PubMed ID: 15567817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. U.S. panel backs research use of fetal tissue from abortions.
Leary WE
N Y Times Web; 1988 Sep; ():1, 10. PubMed ID: 11647855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Gene-splice oversight.
Parens E
Washington Post; 1996 Jun; ():A21. PubMed ID: 11646331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Panel seeks better monitoring of experiments using people.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 2000 Mar; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11873787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Firm gets NIH panel's approval for judge-barred DNA field test.
Hilts PJ
Washington Post; 1984 Jun; ():A1, A10. PubMed ID: 11646391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
