These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647449)

  • 1. Guam loses effort to limit abortion.
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11647449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High court spurns Guam bid to revive curbs on abortion.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Dec; ():A1, A22. PubMed ID: 11647462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High Court has several options for new look at abortion right.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Jun; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 11647437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Justices uphold abortion rights by narrow vote.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11647367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Legal abortion under fierce attack 15 years after Roe v. Wade ruling.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1988 May; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guam Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. Ada.
    U.S. District Court, Territory of Guam
    Fed Suppl; 1990 Aug; 776():1422-32. PubMed ID: 11648401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abortion is affirmed, but in a lower voice.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():E1. PubMed ID: 11647366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion: trouble ahead.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Court gets stark arguments on abortion.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11646254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High court's ruling enshrines abortion as fundamental right.
    Barbash F
    Washington Post; 1983 Jun; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Supreme Court, 5-4, narrowing Roe v. Wade, upholds sharp state limits on abortion.
    Greenhouse L; Dionne EJ
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():1, 10-13. PubMed ID: 11646725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mississippi law fails to reduce abortion strife.
    Applebome P
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Oct; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Burying the dead: the case against revival of pre-Roe and pre-Casey abortion statutes in a post-Casey world.
    Scott TL
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(2):355-89. PubMed ID: 11656256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Debate distant for many having abortions.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1998 Jan; ():A1, A9. PubMed ID: 11647532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right?
    Barber RA
    Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Criminal abortion revisited.
    Buell SW
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 66(6):1774-831. PubMed ID: 11652642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High court asks sharp questions in abortion case.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Apr; ():A1, B14. PubMed ID: 11646764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion as a vice crime: a "what if" story.
    Kaplan J
    Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(1):151-79. PubMed ID: 11650281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medical responsibility for fetal survival under Roe and Doe.
    Sendor BB
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1975; 10(2):444-71. PubMed ID: 11663614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
    Binion G
    Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.