240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647472)
1. Abortion foes win vote in the House on funds for poor.
Clymer A
N Y Times Web; 1993 Jul; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. States rebelling at federal order to cover abortion.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1994 Jan; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 11646999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinton would end ban on aid to poor seeking abortions.
Toner R
N Y Times Web; 1993 Mar; ():A1, A21. PubMed ID: 11647468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. House, by broad margin, backs ban on a type of late abortion.
Seeyle KQ
N Y Times Web; 1997 Mar; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11647515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. U.S. suspends plan to cut off funds for abortion ties.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1988 Mar; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11646665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion.
Butler PA
Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion laws, religious beliefs and the first amendment.
Skahn SL
Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1980; 14(3):487-526. PubMed ID: 11664174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion issue weaves an intricate web.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1986 Apr; ():A26. PubMed ID: 11647369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Rhode Island charter change would bar abortion support.
N Y Times Web; 1986 Jul; ():33. PubMed ID: 11646164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. State policies on funding of abortions: a pooled time series analysis.
Meier KJ; McFarlane DR
Soc Sci Q; 1992 Sep; 73(3):690-8. PubMed ID: 11656318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. All-out foes of abortion active on many fronts.
Kenrick C
Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 1979 Jan; ():8. PubMed ID: 11649085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The persistence of ideological cleavage in voting on abortion legislation in the House of Representatives, 1973-1988.
Tatalovich R; Schier D
Am Polit Q; 1993 Jan; 21(1):125-39. PubMed ID: 11656203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Survey of abortion law.
Platt JG; O'Malley K
Ariz State Law J; 1980; 1980(1):67-216. PubMed ID: 11655392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Restricting federal funds for abortion: another look.
Sommers PM; Thomas LS
Soc Sci Q; 1983 Jun; 64(2):340-6. PubMed ID: 11655746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. U.S. issues limits on abortion aid by family clinics.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1987 Aug; ():1, 26. PubMed ID: 11647377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Equal protection--abortions.
House DE
Denver Law J; 1975; 52(1):100-6. PubMed ID: 11663570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Groups challenging abortion rules.
Lewin T
N Y Times Web; 1988 Feb; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11646640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The politics of funding abortion: state responses to the political environment.
Meier KJ; McFarlane DR
Am Polit Q; 1993 Jan; 21(1):81-101. PubMed ID: 11656209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Door may be open for abortion pill to be sold in U.S.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Feb; ():A1, D23. PubMed ID: 11647467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
