These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647497)
1. Va. debates law on fetal homicide: legislation entangled with abortion issue. Nakashima E Washington Post; 1996 Feb; ():D1, D5. PubMed ID: 11647497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Severe penalties for the destruction of "potential life" -- cruel and unusual punishment? Barlow BA Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1995; 29(2):463-508. PubMed ID: 11656673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reexamining Roe: nineteenth-century abortion statutes and the Fourteenth Amendment. Witherspoon JS St Marys Law J; 1985; 17(1):29-71. PubMed ID: 11655872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. People v. Davis: California's murder statute and the requirement of viability for fetal murder. Qureshi JN Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1995; 25(3):579-614. PubMed ID: 11656563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. When the death of a fetus is murder. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1994 May; ():B20. PubMed ID: 11647483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life. Parness JA; Pritchard SK Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Death of an unborn child: jurisprudential inconsistencies in wrongful death, criminal homicide, and abortion cases. Klasing MS Pepperdine Law Rev; 1995; 22(3):933-79. PubMed ID: 11660413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The born alive doctrine: a legal anachronism. Westerfield L South Univ Law Rev; 1976; 2(2):149-73. PubMed ID: 12083087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The legal status of the unborn after Webster. Parness JA Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence. Buckley M NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection. Johnsen DE Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy. Hopkin WR Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Va. committee kills last of abortion bills. Baker DP N Y Times Web; 1986 Feb; ():C7. PubMed ID: 11647363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion, personhood, and privacy in Texas. Johnson A Tex Law Rev; 1990 Jun; 68(7):1521-44. PubMed ID: 11656019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal abuse: an exploration of emerging philosophic, legal, and policy issues. Losco J West Polit Q; 1989 Jun; 42(2):265-86. PubMed ID: 11659161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis. Peterfy A J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The social construction of personhood. Burkhart J Soc Thought; 1989; 15():2-13. PubMed ID: 11659411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulating IVF human embryo experimentation: the search for a legal basis. Kasimba P Aust Law J; 1988 Feb; 62(2):128-38. PubMed ID: 11659149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]