198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647501)
1. Breaking ranks, lab offers test to assess risk of breast cancer.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1996 Apr; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11647501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tests' availability tangles ethical and genetic codes.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1996 May; ():A1, A22. PubMed ID: 11647109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Is knowledge always good?
King D
Genethics News; 1996; No. 12():6-7. PubMed ID: 11655116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. F.D.A. stand on cloning raises even more questions.
Stolberg SG
N Y Times Web; 1998 Jan; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Testing for genetic susceptibility: what you see is not what you get.
Holtzman NA
Account Res; 1997; 5(1-3):95-101. PubMed ID: 11654816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The DNA hard sell: a gene test may lead to discrimination.
Wadman M
N Y Times Web; 1996 Dec; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11647277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Protecting our 'family secrets'.
Kahn MJ; Jamison KR; Collins FS
Washington Post; 1997 Jul; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11647280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Coming into being: law, ethics, and the practice of prenatal genetic screening.
Malinowski MJ
Hastings Law J; 1994 Aug; 45(6):1435-526. PubMed ID: 11653304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The commercialization of clinical genetics: an analysis of interrelations between academic centers and for-profit clinical genetics diagnostics companies.
Natowicz MR; Ard C
J Genet Couns; 1997 Sep; 6(3):337-55. PubMed ID: 11655206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Gene enhancements' thorny ethical traits.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1997 Oct; ():A1, A18-19. PubMed ID: 11647258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethics panel recommends a ban on human cloning.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1997 Jun; ():22. PubMed ID: 11647217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Tinkering with destiny: genes and cancer.
Brownlee S; Cook GG; Hardigg V
US News World Rep; 1994 Aug; 117(8):58-65, 67. PubMed ID: 11645282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2397-406. PubMed ID: 12692171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mail order gene testing.
Bull S
Bull Med Ethics; 1996 Feb; No. 115():20-1. PubMed ID: 11660246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientists urge senators not to rush to ban human cloning.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1997 Mar; ():B11. PubMed ID: 11647189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Gene tests get tested.
Marshall E
Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5301):782. PubMed ID: 9036543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic testing outside research acceptable, says Cancer Society.
Nature; 1996 May; 381(6579):184. PubMed ID: 11644781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic testing falls short of public embrace.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1998 Mar; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11647298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Code of practice on human genetic testing services supplied direct to the public.
Great Britain. Health Departments of the United Kingdom. Advisory Committee on Genetic Testing
Community Genet; 1998; 1(1):48. PubMed ID: 11660581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Human Genome Project: a challenge to the human rights framework.
Iles AT
Harv Hum Rights J; 1996; 9():27-60. PubMed ID: 11660498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
