387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647563)
1. British cast spotlight on misconduct in scientific research.
Altman LK
N Y Times Web; 1998 Jun; ():F3. PubMed ID: 11647563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Deceit in science: does it really matter?
Birch AJ
Interdiscip Sci Rev; 1990 Dec; 15(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 11651223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Redundant publication in biomedical sciences: scientific misconduct or necessity?
Jefferson T
Sci Eng Ethics; 1998 Apr; 4(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 11657769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Different lessons from the Darsee affair?
Tynan M; Anderson RH
Int J Cardiol; 1984; 5(11):9-11. PubMed ID: 11653729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. When good scientists turn bad.
Roman MB
Discover; 1988 Apr; 9(4):50-55, 57-58. PubMed ID: 11653808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Was the paper I wrote a fraud?
Bowie C
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1755-6. PubMed ID: 11682718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud.
Farthing MJ
Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352 Suppl 4():SIV11. PubMed ID: 9872158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Misconduct in science is not rare, a survey finds.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11647007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Tobacco company set up network of sympathetic scientists.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1998 May; 316(7144):1555. PubMed ID: 11645059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The exposure of a scientific fraud.
Swan N
New Sci; 1988 Dec; 120(1641):30-1. PubMed ID: 11655909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Global trend: more science, more fraud.
Altman L; Broad WJ
N Y Times Web; 2005 Dec; ():F1, F6. PubMed ID: 16450465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New charges hit Illmensee.
MacKenzie D
New Sci; 1984 May; 102(1412):3-4. PubMed ID: 11655608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Time to face up to research misconduct.
Smith R
BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7034):789-90. PubMed ID: 8608272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The persistence of fraud in the literature: the Darsee case.
Kochan CA; Budd JM
J Am Soc Inf Sci; 1992 Aug; 43(7):488-93. PubMed ID: 11653988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. UK royal college responds to scientific fraud.
Ramsay S
Lancet; 1995 Jun; 345(8964):1566. PubMed ID: 11657385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Their learned friends: was a scientific society really a front for one of the world's biggest tobacco firms?
Concar D
New Sci; 1998 May; 158(2134):5. PubMed ID: 11656716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cheating in science and publishing.
Altman LK
CBE Views; 1981; 4(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 11649550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Science's faulty fraud detectors.
Broad WJ; Wade N
Psychol Today; 1982 Nov; 16(11):51-54, 57. PubMed ID: 11649505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.
Pennock RT
Public Aff Q; 1996 Oct; 10(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 11654653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
