387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647563)
21. British editors form misconduct panel.
Kaiser J
Science; 1997 Aug; 277(5326):627. PubMed ID: 11644953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
Kuzma SM
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Lies, damned lies, and science -- BBC2 Horizon: "The Betrayers," 13 Mar 1995.
Wilmshurst P
BMJ; 1995 Mar; 310(6981):747. PubMed ID: 11644676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
Kline S
J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Research fraud: discouraging the others.
Lock S
BMJ; 1990 Dec; 301(6765):1348. PubMed ID: 11642809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Deception in scientific research.
Woolf PK
Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Procedures for Responding to Charges of Unethical Research Practices, Revised March 1985 Report of the Faculty Ad Hoc Committee to Investigate Research Fraud, 30 September 1986.
University of California, San Diego. School of Medicine
Minerva; 1987; 25(4):502-12. PubMed ID: 11650156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
Sise CB
San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. AIDS experts leave journal after studies are criticized.
Altman LK
N Y Times Web; 1997 Oct; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11647304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The assault on David Baltimore.
Kevles DJ
New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Character and the ethical conduct of research.
Pellegrino ED
Account Res; 1992; 2(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 11651456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Editorial ethics questioned.
Vogel G
Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5303):1055. PubMed ID: 11644901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
Hilgartner S
IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Science, journalism, and whistle-blowing.
Koshland DE
Science; 1988 Apr; 240(4852):585. PubMed ID: 11644303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Allegations of dishonesty in research and their treatment by American universities.
Mazur A
Minerva; 1989; 27(2-3):177-94. PubMed ID: 11654071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An editor's response to fraudsters.
Farthing MJ
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1729-31. PubMed ID: 9652922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research.
Wells F
Account Res; 1997; 5(1-3):25-38. PubMed ID: 11654814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. On the hazards of whistleblowers and on some problems of young biomedical scientists in our time.
Edsall JT
Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Oct; 1(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 11657783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The Nuremberg Code and medical research.
Grodin MA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):4. PubMed ID: 11650360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Ethical values in the education of biomedical researchers.
Heitman E
Hastings Cent Rep; 2000; 30(4 Suppl):S40-4. PubMed ID: 11658244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
