163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647658)
21. Genetic witness: forensic uses of DNA tests.
Nishimi RY; O'Connor KW; Gwin HL; Anderson MA
J Int Bioethique; 1991; 2(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 11651050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. State v. Olivas.
Washington. Supreme Court
Pac Rep Second Ser; 1993 Aug; 856():1076-94. PubMed ID: 12041122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Jones v. Murray.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Fed Report; 1992 Apr; 962():302-15. PubMed ID: 11648258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Department of Defense DNA registry raises legal, ethical issues.
Mnookin S
Genewatch; 1996 Aug; 10(1):1, 3, 11. PubMed ID: 11656662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Adjudicating neurogenetics at the crossroads: privacy, adoption, and the death sentence.
Zweig FM; Walsh JT; Freeman DM
Judges J; 1997; 36(3):52-55, 57-58, 90-93. PubMed ID: 11656824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A rape defendant with no identity, but a DNA profile.
Dedman B
N Y Times Web; 1999 Oct; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11647723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. DNA detectives.
Kluger J
Time; 1999 Jan; 153(1):62-3. PubMed ID: 11656967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Timing is everything for tissue-sample genetics.
Haglund K
J NIH Res; 1997 Jan; 9(1):10. PubMed ID: 11654602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Two marines who refused to comply with genetic-testing order face a court-martial.
Lewis NA
N Y Times Web; 1996 Apr; ():7. PubMed ID: 11647101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Arresting evidence.
Dawkins R
Sciences (New York); 1998; 38(6):20-5. PubMed ID: 11657757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. New Zealand court allows national blood samples to be used in civil trial.
Coney S
Lancet; 1999 Aug; 354(9180):753. PubMed ID: 11660684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Seven women say Correction Dept. told officers to have abortions.
Brozan N
N Y Times Web; 1989 May; ():33. PubMed ID: 11646718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The precarious implications of DNA profiling.
Smith JC
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1994; 55(3):865-88. PubMed ID: 11655079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Controls on DNA could impact research.
Kaiser J
Science; 1996 Jul; 273(5273):299. PubMed ID: 11644818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Sanders v. Coman.
U.S. District Court, E.D. North Carolina, W.D.
Fed Suppl; 1994 Oct; 864():496-502. PubMed ID: 11648290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. DNA data banking: the dangerous erosion of privacy.
Shapiro ED; Weinberg ML
Clevel State Law Rev; 1990; 38(3):455-86. PubMed ID: 11651144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Florida tries DNA sampling to protect children.
N Y Times Web; 1999 Jan; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. For sale in Iceland: a nation's genetic code.
Schwartz J
Washington Post; 1999 Jan; ():A1, A4. PubMed ID: 11647691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Of doctors and detectives.
Scott G; Marshall MF; Tindall C
N Y Times Web; 2001 Nov; ():F7. PubMed ID: 12159885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Dangerous intersections.
Korn D
Issues Sci Technol; 1996; 13(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11654761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
