These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647732)

  • 1. Massachusetts case is latest to ask court to decide fate of frozen embryos.
    Goldberg C
    N Y Times Web; 1999 Nov; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11647732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kass v. Kass.
    New York. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department
    Wests N Y Suppl; 1997 Sep; 663():581-602. PubMed ID: 12041117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Israeli court gives wife right to embryos.
    Greenberg J
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Sep; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11647247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. To dispose or not to dispose: questioning the fate of preembryos after a divorce in J.B. v. M.B.
    Issa F
    Houst Law Rev; 2003; 39(5):1549-90. PubMed ID: 15212012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disputing over embryos: of contracts and consents.
    Waldman EA
    Ariz State Law J; 2000; 32(3):897-940. PubMed ID: 12769122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Judge orders divorcing couple's frozen embryos destroyed.
    N Y Times Web; 1998 Sep; ():B6. PubMed ID: 11647640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From a to z: analysis of Massachusetts' approach to the enforceability of cryopreserved pre-embryo dispositional agreements.
    Kaplan S
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 2001 Dec; 81(5):1093-118. PubMed ID: 12715818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. My egg, your sperm, whose preembryo? A proposal for deciding which party receives custody of frozen preembryos.
    Katz DA
    Va J Soc Policy Law; 1998; 5(3):623-74. PubMed ID: 11979606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prior agreements for disposition of frozen embryos.
    Robertson JA
    Ohio State Law J; 1990; 51(2):407-24. PubMed ID: 11652816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is Roe v. Wade obsolete?
    Destro RA
    Hum Life Rev; 1998; 24(3):55-70. PubMed ID: 11657681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tennessee judge awards custody of 7 frozen embryos to woman.
    Smothers R
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Sep; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11647867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frozen embryos: a need for thawing in the legislative process.
    Davidoff BE
    SMU Law Rev; 1993; 47(1):131-64. PubMed ID: 11652686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Court says woman can bar embryos' use.
    N Y Times Web; 2001 Aug; ():B6. PubMed ID: 12155241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No ABA embryo policy.
    Washington Post; 1998 Feb; ():A5. PubMed ID: 11647577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The legal dimensions of in vitro fertilization: cryopreserved embryos frozen in legal limbo.
    Cuva AJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1991; 8(part 2):383-414. PubMed ID: 16144101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles?
    Sheinbach DM
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1999; 48(3):989-1027. PubMed ID: 12611403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Court gives ex-husband rights on use of embryos.
    Smothers R
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Navigating the slippery slope of frozen embryo disputes: the case for a contractual approach.
    Fleming NA
    Temple Law Rev; 2002; 75(2):345-74. PubMed ID: 15156893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A ray of light about frozen embryos.
    Clayton EW
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1992 Dec; 2(4):347-59. PubMed ID: 11645754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frozen embryo disputes revisited: a trilogy of procreation-avoidance approaches.
    Daar JF
    J Law Med Ethics; 2001; 29(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 11508196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.