385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647789)
1. What should we do with surplus potential humans?
Annas GJ
Washington Post; 1985 Mar; ():K1, K5. PubMed ID: 11647789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Lack of federal funds, oversight for IVF and embryo transfer focus of congressional hearing.
Med World News; 1984 Sep; 25(17):67, 71. PubMed ID: 11645527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. IVF--in vitro fertilization.
Kieffer GH
Am Biol Teach; 1980 Apr; 42(4):211-218, 231. PubMed ID: 11658496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice.
Schenker JG; Frenkel DA
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies.
American Fertility Society. Ethics Committee
Fertil Steril; 1986 Sep; 46(3) Suppl. 1):1S-94S. PubMed ID: 11658710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproductive help: widespread and unregulated.
Gleick J
N Y Times Web; 1987 Mar; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11646511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Artificial conception: legislative approaches.
Krause HD
Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Intimations of life: extracorporeality and the law.
Smith GP
Gonzaga Law Rev; 1985-1986; 21(2):395-424. PubMed ID: 11658788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies.
American Fertility Society. Ethics Committee
Fertil Steril; 1990 Jun; 53(6) Suppl. 2):i-1S-109S. PubMed ID: 11659223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro fertilization: eliminating the current state of limbo between pre-embryonic rights and the fundamental right to procreate.
Langley DB
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1991; 26(4):1217-43. PubMed ID: 11659618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: medicolegal aspects of a new technique to create a family.
Annas GJ; Elias S
Fam Law Q; 1983; 17(2):199-223. PubMed ID: 11658509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: fertile areas for litigation.
Lorio KV
Southwest Law J; 1982 Feb; 35(5):973-1011. PubMed ID: 11658618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Gestational surrogacy: unsettling state parentage law and surrogacy policy.
Hofheimer A
Rev Law Soc Change; 1992; 19(3):571-616. PubMed ID: 11659977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Embryo research tests NIH's mettle.
Gavaghan H
Nat Med; 1995 Jan; 1(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 11644731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Alternative reproduction.
Andrews LB; Douglass L
South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):623-82. PubMed ID: 11645847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The human preembryo, the progenitors, and the state: toward a dynamic theory of status, rights, and research policy.
Martin PA; Lagod ML
High Technol Law J; 1990; 5(2):257-310. PubMed ID: 11659412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The law and assisted reproduction in the United Kingdom and United States.
Stenger RL
J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):135-61. PubMed ID: 11654454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Assisted noncoital reproduction: a comparative analysis.
Smith GP
Boston Univ Int Law J; 1990; 8(1):21-52. PubMed ID: 11659376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The British law on assisted reproduction: a liberal law by comparison with many other European laws.
Sutton A
Ethics Med; 1996; 12(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 11660744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation.
Lorio KV
LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
