114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647792)
1. Hospital allegedly let some newborns die.
Kamen A
Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Wrongdoing denied in care of 24 handicapped babies.
Hall HB
Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A2. PubMed ID: 11646426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Life-and-death lottery in the nursery.
Hentoff N
Washington Post; 1984 Apr; ():A21. PubMed ID: 11647767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Suit filed in Oklahoma alleging twenty-four infants died after being denied beneficial medical treatment.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 11651816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Johnson v. Sullivan.
Nimz MM
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 11644472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Elin Daniels case: an examination of the legal, medical, and ethical considerations posed when parents and doctors disagree on whether to treat a defective newborn.
Portela C
Forum; 1983; 18(4):709-27. PubMed ID: 11658577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
Smith SR
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria?
Longino PH
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Johnson v. Thompson.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Fed Report; 1992 Aug; 971():1487-99. PubMed ID: 11648605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
Kuzma AL
Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The ultimate parental nightmare: should our 'bad baby' live or die?
Lyon J
Washington Post; 1985 Feb; ():C1, C2. PubMed ID: 11646289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Judge rejects U.S. role in 'Baby Doe' case.
Barringer F
Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A33. PubMed ID: 11646343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Decision to pursue Baby Doe case born in confusion at HHS.
Barringer F
Washington Post; 1983 Dec; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. On letting some babies die.
Smith DH
Stud Hastings Cent; 1974 May; 2(2):37-46. PubMed ID: 11661065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
Horan DJ; Balch BJ
Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma?
Shapiro RS; Barthel R
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Early management and decision-making for the treatment of myelomeningocele at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center: observations clinical and ethical.
Allsopp ME
Linacre Q; 1986 Feb; 53(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 11650727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Severely disabled newborns: to live or let die?
Jackson CC
J Leg Med; 1987 Mar; 8(1):135-76. PubMed ID: 11644153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Issues in health care meriting particular Christian concern--a priority issue: the severely defective newborn.
Roy DJ
Linacre Q; 1982 Feb; 49(1):60-80. PubMed ID: 11650521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Should every Baby Doe die?
Barringer F
Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():B5. PubMed ID: 11646281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
