438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647804)
1. Fight over animal experiments gains intensity on many fronts.
Eckholm E
N Y Times Web; 1985 May; ():C1, C3. PubMed ID: 11647804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Of mice and medicine: balancing scientific needs and animal welfare.
Iglehart JK
Washington Post; 1985 Sep; ():Health Su-15. PubMed ID: 11647799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethics and animals.
Zak S
Atl Mon; 1989 Mar; 263(3):68-74. PubMed ID: 11659112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Winning through intimidation?
Budiansky S
US News World Rep; 1987 Aug; 103(9):48-9. PubMed ID: 11653798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Animal rights and wrongs.
Stryker J
Healthscan; 1984; 1(3):3-10. PubMed ID: 11658711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Creating a private cause of action against abusive animal research.
McDonald KL
Univ PA Law Rev; 1986; 134(2):399-432. PubMed ID: 11649857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The rights of animals and requirements of science.
Boffey PM
N Y Times Web; 1985 Aug; ():E8. PubMed ID: 11646157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The three Rs in research and education: a long road ahead in the United States.
Orlans FB
Altern Lab Anim; 1996; 24(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 11660275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Animals in research: the case for experimentation.
King FA
Psychol Today; 1984 Sep; 18(9):56-8. PubMed ID: 11650675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Research on animals: values, politics, and regulatory reform.
Dresser R
South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Jul; 58(5):1147-201. PubMed ID: 11659004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Animal research: a call for legislative reform requiring ethical merit review.
Brody M
HELR Harvard Environ Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):423-84. PubMed ID: 11659214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Animal experimentation: issues for the 1980s.
Zola JC; Sechzer JA; Sieber JE; Griffin A
Sci Technol Human Values; 1984; 9(2):40-50. PubMed ID: 11650677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving standards for laboratory animals.
Brown GE
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1984 May; 130(70):E2453-6. PubMed ID: 11658688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Out from under the microscope: a case for laboratory animal rights.
Subar LM
Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1987; 1987(2):511-46. PubMed ID: 11659079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Man's relation to experimental animals: modern times--the present situation in Switzerland.
Weibel ER
Acta Physiol Scand; 1986; 128(Suppl. 554):41-8. PubMed ID: 11650001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Animal models in biomedical research: some epistemological worries.
LaFollette H; Shanks N
Public Aff Q; 1993 Apr; 7(2):113-30. PubMed ID: 11652915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Animal welfare group seeks ban on MAbs from mouse ascites.
Lewin DI
J NIH Res; 1997 Jul; 9(7):22-3. PubMed ID: 11656640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The goal of animal welfare, animal "rights", and antivivisectionist groups in the United States.
Traystman RJ
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 1990 Sep; 2(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 11650957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Worries about animal models in biomedical research: a response to LaFollette and Shanks.
Willis LR; Hulsey MG
Public Aff Q; 1994 Apr; 8(2):205-18. PubMed ID: 11652920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The modern politics of laboratory animal use.
Moss TH
Sci Technol Human Values; 1984; 9(2):51-6. PubMed ID: 11650678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]