These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647807)

  • 41. Whose child is this?
    Lacayo R
    Time; 1987 Jan; 129(3):56-8. PubMed ID: 11653748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Court restores Baby M visits by Whitehead.
    Hanley R
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Apr; ():1, 30. PubMed ID: 11646554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Babies for sale.
    Fox R
    Public Interest; 1993; 11():14-40. PubMed ID: 11656370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Surrogate parenthood: a need for legislative direction.
    Mawdsley RD
    Ill Bar J; 1983 Mar; 71(7):412-7. PubMed ID: 11658679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Sexuality, privacy and the new biology.
    Smith GP; Iraola R
    Marquette Law Rev; 1984; 67(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 11658703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Status and contract in surrogate motherhood: an illumination of the surrogacy debate.
    Dolgin JL
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1990; 38(2):515-50. PubMed ID: 11650993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. On bearing someone else's baby.
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Aug; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11646534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. What, if anything, is wrong with baby selling?
    Radin MJ
    Pac Law J; 1995 Jan; 26(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 11660370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Baby M and controversy over fertility.
    Peterson I
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Jan; ():30. PubMed ID: 11647829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The 'Baby M' ruling: elegant, flawed.
    Gould L; Gould RE
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Feb; ():A31. PubMed ID: 11646194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Two mothers, one baby, no law.
    Goldfarb C
    Human Rights; 1983; 11(2):27-29, 54-56. PubMed ID: 11649554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Artificial insemination and surrogate motherhood--a nursery full of unresolved questions.
    Harris LE
    Willamette Law Rev; 1981; 17(4):913-52. PubMed ID: 11658334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: legal issues.
    Field M
    Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1589-98. PubMed ID: 11653381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Whose baby is it? Surrogate motherhood after Baby M.
    Rust M
    ABA J; 1987 Jun; 73(6):52, 54-56. PubMed ID: 11649853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
    Abbas J
    Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The case against the commercialization of childbearing.
    Kimbrell A
    Willamette Law Rev; 1988; 24(4):1035-51. PubMed ID: 11650170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Surrogate mothering: medical reality in a legal vacuum.
    Vieth PJ
    J Legis; 1981; 8(1):140-59. PubMed ID: 11649382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Baby M case: surrogate mothers vent feelings.
    Peterson I
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Feb; ():B1, B4. PubMed ID: 11646567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Artificial insemination and the law.
    Jensen BJ
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(4):935-90. PubMed ID: 11658495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Surrogate mothers grow in number despite questions.
    Lawson C
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Oct; ():C1, C18. PubMed ID: 11646530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.