BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647812)

  • 1. Dying woman wins Jersey ruling to end life-sustaining care.
    Sullivan R
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():B1, B2. PubMed ID: 11647812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In the Matter of Kathleen Farrell.
    Paulus SM
    Issues Law Med; 1987 Jan; 2(4):333-6. PubMed ID: 11644068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In re Jane Doe.
    Cameron JC
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):245-7. PubMed ID: 11644330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In re Farrell.
    New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Ocean County
    Atl Report; 1986 Jun; 514():1342-7. PubMed ID: 11648556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Jersey woman on respirator dies.
    Saxon W
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():B6. PubMed ID: 11646533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The right to die still seems more theory than practice.
    Malcolm AH
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():E5. PubMed ID: 11647259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In re Farrell.
    New Jersey. Supreme Court
    Atl Report; 1987 Jun; 529():404-19. PubMed ID: 11648263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die.
    Zaremba JF
    Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In the matter of Beverly Requena.
    Nimz M
    Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 11644091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wishes of patient in refusing care backed in Jersey.
    Sullivan JF
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Jun; ():A1, B12. PubMed ID: 11647828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conroy, best interests, and the handling of dying patients.
    Cantor NL
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1985; 37(3):543-77. PubMed ID: 11649747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law.
    Jarrett C
    Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):999-1028. PubMed ID: 11650183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Life-and-death decisions.
    Washington Post; 1985 Jan; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11646411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
    Colabrese CA
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Euthanasia and self determinism: is there a Charter right to die in Canada?
    Carnerie F
    McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):299-335. PubMed ID: 11649872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In re Requena.
    New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Morris County
    Atl Report; 1986 Sep; 517():886-93. PubMed ID: 11648300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In re Jane Doe.
    Pennsylvania. Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
    Pa Dist Cty Rep; 1987 Aug; 45():371-90. PubMed ID: 12085890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tune v. Walter Reed Army Medical Hospital.
    Paulus SM
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):251-3. PubMed ID: 11644502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suicidal competence and the patient's right to refuse lifesaving treatment.
    Matthews MA
    Calif Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 75(2):707-58. PubMed ID: 11652518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
    Buchanan AE
    UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.