152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647812)
1. Dying woman wins Jersey ruling to end life-sustaining care.
Sullivan R
N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():B1, B2. PubMed ID: 11647812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In the Matter of Kathleen Farrell.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1987 Jan; 2(4):333-6. PubMed ID: 11644068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In re Jane Doe.
Cameron JC
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):245-7. PubMed ID: 11644330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In re Farrell.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Ocean County
Atl Report; 1986 Jun; 514():1342-7. PubMed ID: 11648556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Jersey woman on respirator dies.
Saxon W
N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():B6. PubMed ID: 11646533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The right to die still seems more theory than practice.
Malcolm AH
N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():E5. PubMed ID: 11647259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In re Farrell.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1987 Jun; 529():404-19. PubMed ID: 11648263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Death with dignity: implementing one's right to die.
Zaremba JF
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(3):557-77. PubMed ID: 11651900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. In the matter of Beverly Requena.
Nimz M
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 11644091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Wishes of patient in refusing care backed in Jersey.
Sullivan JF
N Y Times Web; 1987 Jun; ():A1, B12. PubMed ID: 11647828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Conroy, best interests, and the handling of dying patients.
Cantor NL
Rutgers Law Rev; 1985; 37(3):543-77. PubMed ID: 11649747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law.
Jarrett C
Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):999-1028. PubMed ID: 11650183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Life-and-death decisions.
Washington Post; 1985 Jan; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11646411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
Colabrese CA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Euthanasia and self determinism: is there a Charter right to die in Canada?
Carnerie F
McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):299-335. PubMed ID: 11649872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In re Requena.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Morris County
Atl Report; 1986 Sep; 517():886-93. PubMed ID: 11648300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In re Jane Doe.
Pennsylvania. Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Pa Dist Cty Rep; 1987 Aug; 45():371-90. PubMed ID: 12085890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tune v. Walter Reed Army Medical Hospital.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):251-3. PubMed ID: 11644502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Suicidal competence and the patient's right to refuse lifesaving treatment.
Matthews MA
Calif Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 75(2):707-58. PubMed ID: 11652518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
Buchanan AE
UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]