367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647825)
1. States move to ease law committing mentally ill.
Goleman D
N Y Times Web; 1986 Dec; ():C1, C4. PubMed ID: 11647825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values.
Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Albany debates plan to force treatment on the mentally ill.
Hernandez R
N Y Times Web; 1999 Jul; ():20. PubMed ID: 11648128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Involuntary psychiatric hospitalization: a review of the statutes regulating the social control of the mentally ill.
Gove WR; Tovo M; Hughes M
Deviant Behav; 1985; 6():287-318. PubMed ID: 11658830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of statutory change on the civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Peters R; Miller KS; Schmidt W; Meeter D
Law Hum Behav; 1987 Jun; 11(2):73-99. PubMed ID: 11658913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Lawsuits try to force care for the mentally ill.
Goleman D
N Y Times Web; 1984 Apr; ():C1, C10. PubMed ID: 11646287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The 1983 revision of the Texas mental health code.
Dix GE
St Marys Law J; 1984; 16(1):41-153. PubMed ID: 11658786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Institutionalizing the rights of mental patients: committing the legislature.
Morris GH
Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):957-1024. PubMed ID: 11663464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Stromberg CD; Stone AA
Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
Roth LH
Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal problems involved in implementing the right to treatment.
Morris GH
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1973 Jan; 1(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 11664496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions?
Zenoff EH; Zients AB
George Washington Law Rev; 1983 Jan; 51(2):171-218. PubMed ID: 11658670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychiatric care and the law of substitute decision-making.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1987; 11(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 11658868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right to be crazy.
Isaac RJ; Armat VC
Am Enterp; 1990; 1(5):34-42. PubMed ID: 11659838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Special section on APA's model commitment law: an introduction Key provision of APA's model law.
Appelbaum PS
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Sep; 36(9):966-8. PubMed ID: 11643844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Civil rights and the mentally ill: revolution in bedlam.
Offir CW
Psychol Today; 1974 Oct; 8(5):60-62+. PubMed ID: 11664431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
Belzer I
UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
Brooks AD
Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Guidelines for involuntary civil commitment.
National Center for State Courts' Institute on Mental Disability and the Law
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986; 10(5):409-514. PubMed ID: 11659039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
