These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647830)
1. Right to sue in abortion is upheld. Uhlig MA N Y Times Web; 1987 Jun; ():B1. PubMed ID: 11647830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The abortion alternative and the patient's right to know. Shapiro SC Wash Univ Law Q; 1978; 1978(1):167-210. PubMed ID: 11664983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Wrongful life and wrongful birth: the current status of negligent genetic counseling. DeWalt T Cooley Law Rev; 1985; 3(1):175-91. PubMed ID: 11658818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Hummel v. Reiss: the New Jersey Supreme Court takes a step backward in its recognition of wrongful life. Barrett TA Rutgers Law Rev; 1993; 46(1):535-63. PubMed ID: 11652806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Procanik by Procanik v. Cillo. New Jersey. Supreme Court Atl Report; 1984 Aug; 478():755-73. PubMed ID: 11648486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. No right to sue for "wrongful life. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1982 Apr; 284(6322):1125-6. PubMed ID: 11652373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robak v. United States. U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Fed Report; 1981 Aug; 658():471-80. PubMed ID: 11648469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The legal recognition of medical malpractice tort claims based upon theories of wrongful birth and wrongful life. Mayo KL North Carol Centr Law J; 1985; 15(2):274-94. PubMed ID: 11658795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reform of German abortion law: first experiences. Eser A Am J Comp Law; 1986; 34(2):369-83. PubMed ID: 11655825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Woman suing doctor for stopping abortion. Adams L Washington Post; 1993 Oct; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11647474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mothers as plaintiffs in prenatal tort liability cases: recovery for physical and emotional damages. Bernier BL Harv Womens Law J; 1981; 4(1):43-71. PubMed ID: 11649448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comment: wrongful conception and the right not to be harmed. Feinberg J Harv J Law Public Policy; 1985; 8(1):57-77. PubMed ID: 11655782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Tort liability for wrongfully causing one to be born. Sarno GG Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1978; 83():15-110. PubMed ID: 12091930 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Robak v. United States: a precedent-setting damage formula for wrongful birth. Leightman CW Chic Kent Law Rev; 1982; 58(3):725-64. PubMed ID: 11658600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Casey in the mirror: abortion, abuse and the right to protection in the United States and Germany. Neuman GL Am J Comp Law; 1995; 43(2):273-314. PubMed ID: 11656594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Wrongful birth in the abortion context--critique of existing case law and proposal for future actions. Morris KL Denver Law J; 1976; 53(3):501-20. PubMed ID: 11663712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Becker v. Schwartz. 27 Dec 1978. New York. Court of Appeals North East Rep Second Ser; 1978; 386():807-19. PubMed ID: 12038344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Liability for failure of birth control methods. Mark DJ Columbia Law Rev; 1976 Nov; 76(7):1187-204. PubMed ID: 11643349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]