301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647898)
1. Atlanta court bars efforts to end life support for stricken girl, 13.
Smothers R
N Y Times Web; 1991 Oct; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11647898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Jane Doe.
Georgia. Supreme Court
South East Report Second Ser; 1992 Jul; 418():3-8. PubMed ID: 12041319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. "Mary, Mary, quite contrary, how was I to know?" Michael Martin, absolute prescience, and the right to die in Michigan.
Broder AJ; Cranford RE
Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1995; 72(4):787-832. PubMed ID: 11654371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Minors, medical treatment, and interspousal disagreement: should Solomon split the child?
Feigenbaum MS
De Paul Law Rev; 1992; 41(3):841-84. PubMed ID: 11659593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In the Superior Court of Fulton County, State of Georgia.
Issues Law Med; 1992; 7(4):521-33. PubMed ID: 1563941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Court ruling limits rights of patients: care deemed futile may be withheld.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1995 Apr; ():6. PubMed ID: 11647064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A "terrible beauty", the Irish Supreme Court, and dying.
Feenan D
Eur J Health Law; 1996 Mar; 3(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 11654847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stopping treatment on grounds of futility: a role for institutional policy.
Stell LK
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):481-97. PubMed ID: 11652704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. When physicians balk at futile care: implications of the disability rights laws.
Peters PG
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1997; 91(3):798-864. PubMed ID: 11660527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Baby's death in '92 still being fought: parents sue hospital over shutdown of life support equipment.
Bruni F
N Y Times Web; 1996 Mar; ():6. PubMed ID: 11647122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical futility: a futile concept?
Shiner K
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1996; 53(2):803-48. PubMed ID: 11656798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Withholding care from patients: Boston case asks who decides.
Kolata G
N Y Times Web; 1995 Apr; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11647996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Which parents should give consent? French law and neonates involved in biomedical research.
Byk C
Bull Med Ethics; 1998 Apr; No. 137():19-21. PubMed ID: 11660664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
Bopp J; Coleson RE
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law.
Bopp J; Avila D
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty.
Bopp J; Avila D
Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ends and means of life: the Supreme Court and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration.
Feenan D
J Ir Med Assoc; 1995; 88(5):152, 151. PubMed ID: 11657627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. When medical treatment is futile.
Prager K
Wall St J (East Ed); 1995 Jun; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11647493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of families in medical decisions.
Minow M
Utah Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 11659479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law.
Tarantino LM
Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
