These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647901)

  • 1. Appeals court upholds limits for abortions.
    Hinds Md
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Oct; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
    Berlin SI
    Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parental consent to abortion: how enforcement can vary.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11647920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Workability of the undue burden test.
    Schneider EA
    Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end?
    Henry KS
    Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993-1994 Winter; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Court gets stark arguments on abortion.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11646254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process.
    Goldstein RD
    William Mary Bill Rights J; 1996; 4(3):787-880. PubMed ID: 11660789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1992 Jun; 112():2791-885. PubMed ID: 12041291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Justices deadlocked on state laws restricting minors' access to abortion.
    Taylor S
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Dec; ():B16. PubMed ID: 11646635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence.
    Bigel AI
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1991 Oct; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law.
    Pirner RK; Williams LB
    Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortions for minors after Bellotti II: an analysis of state law and a proposal.
    Lozano GD
    St Marys Law J; 1980; 11(4):946-97. PubMed ID: 11658462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High court sets review on abortion.
    Barbash F
    Washington Post; 1982 May; ():A1, A7. PubMed ID: 11647754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
    Kudner KE
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Will Roe v. Wade survive the Rehnquist Court?
    Johnsen D; Wilder M
    Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):457-69. PubMed ID: 11650350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How rights are infringed: the role of undue burden analysis in constitutional doctrine.
    Brownstein A
    Hastings Law J; 1994 Apr; 45(4):867-959. PubMed ID: 11656422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 1982 Abortion Control Act now in court test.
    Jones KB
    Pa Med; 1982 Dec; 85(12):19-20. PubMed ID: 11643876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Supreme Court, 5-4, narrowing Roe v. Wade, upholds sharp state limits on abortion.
    Greenhouse L; Dionne EJ
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():1, 10-13. PubMed ID: 11646725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.