187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647902)
1. Parts of China forcibly sterilizing the retarded who wish to marry.
Kristof ND
N Y Times Web; 1991 Aug; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Toward a quality population: China's eugenic sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Gewirtz DS
N Y Law Sch J Int Comp Law; 1994; 15(1):139-62. PubMed ID: 11660194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. China weighs using sterilization and abortions to stop 'abnormal' births.
Tyler PE
N Y Times Web; 1993 Dec; ():A9. PubMed ID: 11647963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sterilisation and the mentally handicapped.
Cooney T
Dubl Univ Law J; 1989; 11(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 11659291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Expanding eugenics or improving health care in China: commentary on the Provisions of the Standing Committee of the Gansu People's Congress concerning the prohibition of reproduction by intellectually impaired persons.
Johnson L
J Law Soc; 1997 Jun; 24(2):199-234. PubMed ID: 11660617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Call for international standards in ethics of genetics.
Wertz D
Lancet; 1996 Aug; 348(9027):607. PubMed ID: 11654605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientists debate China's law on sterilizing the carriers of genetic defects.
Rosenthal E
N Y Times Web; 1998 Aug; ():14. PubMed ID: 11647556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sexual sterilization--constitutional validity of involuntary sterilization and consent determinative of voluntariness.
Baker JD
Miss Law Rev; 1975; 40(3):509-26. PubMed ID: 11664500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Chinese region uses new law to sterilize mentally retarded.
Kristof ND
N Y Times Web; 1989 Nov; ():A1, A10. PubMed ID: 11646741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Involuntary sexual sterilization of incompetents in Alabama: past, present, and future.
Larson EJ; Nelson LJ
Ala Law Rev; 1992; 43(2):399-444. PubMed ID: 11659705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The United States' immigration laws: prospects for relief for foreign nationals seeking refuge from coercive sterilization or abortion practices in their homelands.
Tang J
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1996; 15(2):371-401. PubMed ID: 11656877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion and eugenics in Nazi Germany.
David HP; Fleischhacker J; Höhn C
Popul Dev Rev; 1988 Mar; 14(1):81-112. PubMed ID: 11655915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Consent, coercion and consortium: the sexual politics of sterilisation.
Kingdom E
J Law Soc; 1985; 12(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 11658875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The biological alteration cases.
Gelman S
William Mary Law Rev; 1995 May; 36(4):1203-301. PubMed ID: 11660332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Eugenic sterilizations in Japan and recent demands for an apology: a report.
Tsuchiya T
Ethics Intellect Disabil; 1997; 3(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11656892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies.
Sangree S
Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. China orders sterilization for parents.
Weisskopf M
Washington Post; 1983 May; ():A1, A27. PubMed ID: 11646359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Vaccines and the law.
Sanzo M
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 19(1):29-48. PubMed ID: 11659523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproductive rights 1983: an international survey.
Isaacs S
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1982-1983 Fall-Winter; 14(2):311-53. PubMed ID: 11658562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Eliminating the inferior: American and Nazi sterilization programs.
Mehler B
Sci People; 1987; 19(6):14-18, 32. PubMed ID: 11658946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
