These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647921)
1. Doctor is found guilty in fertility case. N Y Times Web; 1992 Mar; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fertility doctor accused of fraud. Ayres BD N Y Times Web; 1991 Nov; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11646885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Criminal conception: behind the white coat. Grothaus-Day C Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):707-25. PubMed ID: 16610153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethics and embryos: did a renowned fertility doctor play God while he made babies? Cowley G Newsweek; 1995 Jun; 125(4):66-7. PubMed ID: 11660033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The doctor, the pharmacist, the patient, and the placebo, or you're not my mother, doctor. Nielsen JR Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1989 Nov; 44(6):639-57. PubMed ID: 11659226 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Japan takes dim view of fertility treatments. Jordan M; Sullivan K Washington Post; 1998 Jul; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11648091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. United States v. Jacobson. United States. District Court. Eastern District of Virginia Wests Fed Suppl; 1992; 785():563-9. PubMed ID: 16372436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical responsibility in the Libyan law. Benomran FA Med Law Int; 1994; 1(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 11652959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Fertility clinics in Chile: a tale of a doctor fleeing U.S. law. Sims C N Y Times Web; 1996 Apr; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Civil law regulation of reproductive technologies: new laws for the new biology? Bercovitch J Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):385-406. PubMed ID: 11651095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research. Kuzma SM Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies: a critique of the final report. Shanner L Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1994 Mar; 27(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 11659921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The fertility market: conflict and competition -- high-tech pregnancies test hope's limit. Gabriel T N Y Times Web; 1996 Jan; ():1, 18-19. PubMed ID: 11647496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetus in Germany: the Fetus Protection Law of 12.13.1990. Deutsch E J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun; 3(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 11651385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Artificial conception: legislative approaches. Krause HD Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Artificial procreation, societal reconceptions: legal insight from France. Jones DJ Am J Comp Law; 1988; 36(3):525-45. PubMed ID: 11659138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Babies in limbo: law outpaced by fertility advances. Weiss R Washington Post; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation. Lorio KV LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]