These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647929)
1. Two Supreme Court rulings provide mentally ill defendants new protections. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. New directions in the right to refuse mental health treatment: the implications of Riggins v. Nevada. Winick BJ William Mary Bill Rights J; 1993; 2(2):205-38. PubMed ID: 11659830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication? Dlugacz HA Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada. Winick BJ N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The judicial side effects of involuntary medication as it relates to a criminal defendant's right to a fair trial: Riggins v. Nevada. Gutierrez L Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 19(2):355-77. PubMed ID: 11660111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A review of the Burger Court: Part I. Parry J Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Court upholds forced treatment of mentally ill by prison officials. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1990 Feb; ():A1, A21. PubMed ID: 11647879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The administration of psychotropic drugs to prisoners: state of the law and beyond. Floyd J Calif Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 78(5):1243-85. PubMed ID: 11659407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reevaluating substantive due process as a source of protection for psychiatric patients to refuse drugs. Brooks WM Indiana Law Rev; 1998; 31(4):937-1017. PubMed ID: 15386905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Right of a defendant to refuse antipsychotic medication during a criminal trial. Williams KG Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Sep; 50(4):1937-9. PubMed ID: 11660177 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fourteenth amendment--the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs masked by prison bars. Sindel PE J Crim Law Criminol; 1991; 81(4):952-80. PubMed ID: 16145787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. United States Supreme Court and psychiatry: a critical look. Malmquist CP J Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(1-2):137-64. PubMed ID: 11658821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New hearing on forced medication of inmate. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1990 Nov; ():A30. PubMed ID: 11646793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Involuntary commitment: the move toward dangerousness. Weissbourd R John Marshall Law Rev; 1982; 15(1):83-113. PubMed ID: 11658335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant. Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of a mentally ill individual's right to refuse medication under the United States and the New York State constitutions. Brooks WM Touro Law Rev; 1991; 8(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 11659527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial. Klein DW Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs. Cort RS UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Police power commitments: towards a legal response to violence among the mentally ill. Neff RC Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1982; 13(2):421-61. PubMed ID: 11658796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]