266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647941)
1. Testing newborns for AIDS virus raises issue of mothers' privacy.
Navarro M
N Y Times Web; 1993 Aug; ():1, 44. PubMed ID: 11647941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Unblinded mandatory HIV screening of newborns: care or coercion?
Post LF
Cardozo Law Rev; 1994 Aug; 16(1):169-227. PubMed ID: 11659978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Battle lines drawn over newborn H.I.V. disclosure.
Sack K
N Y Times Web; 1994 Jun; ():23, 29. PubMed ID: 11647979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mothers to get AIDS test data in Albany rule.
Dao J
N Y Times Web; 1995 Oct; ():A1, B4. PubMed ID: 11648010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Public policy versus private rights: the medical, social, ethical, and legal implications of the testing of newborns for HIV.
Ploughman P
AIDS Public Policy J; 1995-1996 Winter; 10(4):182-204. PubMed ID: 11654732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. H.I.V. screening of newborn infants: survey of recent halakhic periodical literature.
Bleich JD
Tradition; 1994; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 11659902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. H.I.V. test disclosure to mothers welcomed.
Holloway L
N Y Times Web; 1995 Oct; ():37. PubMed ID: 11648011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. H.I.V. testing for newborns debated anew.
Sontag D
N Y Times Web; 1997 Feb; ():A1, B6. PubMed ID: 11648056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The AIDS exception: privacy vs. public health.
Burr C
Atl Mon; 1997 Jun; 279(6):57-67. PubMed ID: 11655272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mandatory non-anonymous testing of newborns for HIV: should it ever be allowed?
Sternlight JR
John Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 27(2):373-91. PubMed ID: 11654699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandatory H.I.V. testing for newborns draws complaints.
Richardson L
N Y Times Web; 1997 Jun; ():B1, B2. PubMed ID: 11648054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Neonatal HIV testing: governmental inspection of the baby factory.
Isaacman SH
John Marshall Law Rev; 1991; 24(3):571-624. PubMed ID: 11659664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The confidentiality of HIV-related information: responding to the resurgence of aggressive public health interventions in the AIDS epidemic.
Doughty R
Calif Law Rev; 1994 Jan; 82(1):111-84. PubMed ID: 11652741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Newborn HIV screening and New York Assembly Bill No. 6747-B: privacy and equal protection of pregnant women.
Curnin KJ
Fordham Urban Law J; 1994; 21(3):857-926. PubMed ID: 11660117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Surveillance and reporting of HIV infection and AIDS in Canada: ethics and law.
Hamblin J; Somerville MA
Univ Tor Law J; 1991; 41(2):224-46. PubMed ID: 11659587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mandatory testing of pregnant women: a strategy for challenging the law.
Cooper EB
AIDS Policy Law; 1996 Aug; Bonus Report():1-2. PubMed ID: 11660351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Babies have rights, too.
Leo J
US News World Rep; 1995 May; 118(17):23. PubMed ID: 11659994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Senate votes to require telling mothers of H.I.V. results.
Sack K
N Y Times Web; 1995 Apr; ():B4. PubMed ID: 11647998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The deadly politics of AIDS.
Smith HM
Wall St J (East Ed); 1995 Oct; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. HIV-specific crime legislation: targeting an epidemic for criminal prosecution.
O'Toole EM
J Law Health; 1995-1996; 10(1):183-208. PubMed ID: 11655191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]