These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11647958)
1. After deaths, F.D.A. is proposing stiffer rules on drug experiments. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():A1, C6. PubMed ID: 11647958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. U.S. doctor drops patient for criticizing drug trial. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1993 Oct; ():9. PubMed ID: 11647959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The cure that killed. Thompson L Discover; 1994 Mar; 15(3):56-62. PubMed ID: 11652306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. And then the patients suddenly started dying: how NIH missed warning signs in drug test. Schwartz J Washington Post; 1993 Sep; ():A1, A8-9. PubMed ID: 11646989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fatal drug trial raises questions about 'informed consent'. Altman LK N Y Times Web; 1993 Oct; ():C3. PubMed ID: 11647940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. U.S. moves to require disclosure of gene tests. Stolberg SG N Y Times Web; 1999 Oct; ():A9. PubMed ID: 11648138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. For first time, gene therapy is tested on cancer patients. Angier N N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 11646836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Proposal on waiver of informed consent poses major issues for research ethics. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11660533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Government guinea pigs. Rothman DJ N Y Times Web; 1994 Jan; ():E21. PubMed ID: 11646304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. F.D.A. officials fault Penn team in gene therapy death. Stolberg SG N Y Times Web; 1999 Dec; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11648139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandating research with children. Baylis F IRB; 1999; 21(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 11657966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. IRB review of adverse events in investigational drug studies. Prentice ED; Gordon B IRB; 1997; 19(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11656910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Women in clinical trials: an introduction. Merkatz RB Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 11653138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In tests on people, who watches the watchers? Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():F1, F4. PubMed ID: 11648129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey. Katz J IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Harm to research subjects will now lead to new federal regulations. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1994 Dec; 9(12):1-3. PubMed ID: 11654161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The quality of mercy. Crigger BJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(3):3. PubMed ID: 11643129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical issues in clinical neurological research. Shore D; Berg K; Mullican C J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 11653329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. If it's research, it must be reviewed: an NIH reprimand. Levine C Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 11643913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Research compliance changes will affect rules on protection of human subjects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1999 May; 14(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]