190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648036)
1. New York seeks to tighten rules on medical research.
Rosenthal E
N Y Times Web; 1996 Sep; ():B4. PubMed ID: 11648036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Research on healthy volunteers: a report of the Royal College of Physicians.
Royal College of Physicians
J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1986 Oct; 20(4):3-17. PubMed ID: 11643937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Constraints on experimentation: protecting children to death.
Holder AR
Yale Law Policy Rev; 1988; 6(1):137-56. PubMed ID: 11650241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act.
Netherlands
Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Nov; No. 152():13-8. PubMed ID: 11658081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Calls for strengthened drug-trial guidelines in Japan.
Netley G
Lancet; 1997 Feb; 349(9051):552. PubMed ID: 11654595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Law and medical experimentation: of embryos, children and others with limited legal capacity.
Dworkin G
Monash Univ Law Rev; 1987 Dec; 13(4):189-208. PubMed ID: 11659196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Law No. 88-1138 of 20 Dec 1988 on the Protection of Persons Participating in Biomedical Research.
France
Int Dig Health Legis; 1989; 40(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 11659174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent: the FDA's perspective.
Bagley G
Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 11653141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethics lapses at Duke halt dozens of human experiments.
Hilts PJ; Stolberg SG
N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():A26. PubMed ID: 11648115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Protection of persons undergoing biomedical research: Code of Public Health; Book IIA.
France
Bull Med Ethics; 1991 Mar; No. 66():8-11. PubMed ID: 11651087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent in the clinical research setting: experimentation on human subjects.
Owens JF
Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 11653829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical issues in the testing of new drugs in man.
Gardner EC
J Drug Issues; 1977; 7(3):275-86. PubMed ID: 11662867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Legal aspects of experimentation with institutionalized mentally disabled subjects.
Laves BS
J Clin Pharmacol New Drugs; 1976 Part 2): 592-599, Oct; 16(10):. PubMed ID: 11664683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An IRB member's perspective on access to innovative therapy.
Moore DL
Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):559-81. PubMed ID: 11652854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Bailey v. Lally.
U.S. District Court, D. Maryland
Fed Suppl; 1979 Jul; 481():203-28. PubMed ID: 11648153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Minors' assent, consent, or dissent to medical research.
Leikin S
IRB; 1993; 15(2):1-7. PubMed ID: 11651566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Guidelines for medical research -- some ethical and legal problems.
McHale JV
Med Law Rev; 1993; 1(2):160-85. PubMed ID: 11660491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. On paying money to research subjects: 'due' and 'undue' inducements.
Macklin R
IRB; 1981 May; 3(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent in psychiatric research.
Roth LH; Appelbaum PS; Lidz CW; Benson P; Winslade WJ
Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):425-41. PubMed ID: 11659013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects.
Macklin R
IRB; 1989; 11(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11650284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
