158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11648050)
1. Federal judge supports California doctors on marijuana issue.
Golden T
N Y Times Web; 1997 Apr; ():7. PubMed ID: 11648050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical use of marijuana: legal and ethical conflicts in the patient/physician relationship.
Grey MW
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1996 Jan; 30(1):249-74. PubMed ID: 11656854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. From the editors.
Kuhse H; Singer P
Bioethics; 1997 Apr; 11(2):iii-. PubMed ID: 11654796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Survey finds support for marijuana use by cancer patients.
Treaster JB
N Y Times Web; 1991 May; ():D22. PubMed ID: 11646247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. House backs ban on using medicine to aid in suicide: reaction to Oregon law.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1999 Oct; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11647716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Oregon chafes at measure to stop assisted suicides.
Verhovek SH
N Y Times Web; 1999 Oct; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 11647718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Threat from Washington has chilling effect on Oregon law allowing assisted suicide.
Egan T
N Y Times Web; 1997 Nov; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11647283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reefer madness--the federal response to California's medical-marijuana law.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 1997 Aug; 337(6):435-9. PubMed ID: 9241134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward a more perfect union: a federal cause of action for physician aid-in-dying.
Robichaud TD
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1994; 27(2):521-64. PubMed ID: 11656405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Seeley v. State.
Washington. Supreme Court
Pac Rep Second Ser; 1997 Jul; 940():604-32. PubMed ID: 12041123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lawsuit seeks to bar U.S. from access to AIDS files.
Lewin T
N Y Times Web; 1996 Apr; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11647112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Autonomy and privacy: protecting patients from their physicians.
Bobinski MA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1994; 55(2):291-388. PubMed ID: 11659957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tardive dyskinesia: medical facts and legal fictions.
Taub S
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):833-75. PubMed ID: 11649880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The dispersion of genetic technologies and the law.
Clayton EW
Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(3 Suppl):S13-5. PubMed ID: 11654184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Laws won't let H.M.O.'s tell doctors what to say.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1996 Sep; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11648039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. House votes ban on a method used in late abortions.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1996 Mar; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11647504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Forgoing treatment of critically ill newborns and the legal legacy of Baby Doe.
Nelson LJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1992; 6(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Toward a First Amendment theory of doctor-patient discourse and the right to receive unbiased medical advice.
Berg P
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1994 Mar; 74(2):201-66. PubMed ID: 11659979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Taking Tarasoff where no one has gone before: looking at "duty to warn" under the AIDS crisis.
Stenger CE
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1996; 15(2):471-504. PubMed ID: 11656884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetic fallout: new technologies are changing the legal landscape.
Andrews LB
Trial; 1995 Dec; 31(12):20-23, 25-27. PubMed ID: 11660434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
